Arias H R
Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Bahía Blanca, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina.
J Neurosci Res. 1996 Apr 15;44(2):97-105. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19960415)44:2<97::AID-JNR1>3.0.CO;2-B.
A major focus of current research on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) has been to understand the molecular mechanism of ion channel inhibition. In particular, we put special emphasis on the description of the localization of the agonist self-inhibitory binding site. Binding of agonist in the millimolar concentration range to this particular site produces inhibition of the ion flux activity previously elicited by the same agonist at micromolar concentrations. Due to the similitude in the pharmacological and electrophysiological behavior in inhibiting the ion channel of both high agonist concentrations and noncompetitive antagonists, we first describe the localization of noncompetitive inhibitor binding sites on the AChR. There is a great body of experimental evidence for the existence and location of luminal high-affinity noncompetitive inhibitor binding sites. In this regard, the most simple mechanism to describe the action of noncompetitive inhibitors which bind to luminal sites and, by its semblance, the agonist self-inhibition itself, is based on the assumption that these compounds enter the open channel, bind to different rings within the M2 transmembrane domain of the receptor, and block cation flux by occluding the receptor pore. However, the existence of high-affinity nonluminal noncompetitive inhibitor binding sites is not consistent with the open-channel-blocking mechanism. Instead, the presence of the quinacrine locus at the lipid-protein (alpha M1) interface approximately 7 A from the lipid-water interface and the ethidium domain located approximately 46 A from the membrane surface in the wall of the vestibule open the possibility for the regulation of cation permeation by an allosteric process. Additionally, the observed (at least partially) overlapping between the quinacrine and the agonist self-inhibitory binding site also suggests an allosteric process for agonist self-inhibition. For this alternative mechanism, cholinergic agonist molecules first need to be partitioned into (or to be adsorbed onto) the lipid membrane to further interact with its binding site located at the lipid-protein interface.
目前对烟碱型乙酰胆碱受体(AChR)的研究主要集中在理解离子通道抑制的分子机制上。特别是,我们特别强调对激动剂自身抑制性结合位点定位的描述。毫摩尔浓度范围内的激动剂与该特定位点结合会抑制先前微摩尔浓度的相同激动剂所引发的离子通量活性。由于高浓度激动剂和非竞争性拮抗剂在抑制离子通道方面的药理和电生理行为相似,我们首先描述非竞争性抑制剂结合位点在AChR上的定位。有大量实验证据证明腔内高亲和力非竞争性抑制剂结合位点的存在及其位置。在这方面,描述与腔内位点结合的非竞争性抑制剂的作用以及类似地激动剂自身抑制作用的最简便机制是基于这样的假设:这些化合物进入开放通道,与受体M2跨膜结构域内的不同环结合,并通过堵塞受体孔来阻断阳离子通量。然而,高亲和力非腔内非竞争性抑制剂结合位点的存在与开放通道阻断机制不一致。相反,在距脂质 - 水界面约7埃的脂质 - 蛋白质(αM1)界面处存在奎纳克林位点,以及在前庭壁中距膜表面约46埃处存在乙锭结构域,这为通过变构过程调节阳离子渗透提供了可能性。此外,观察到的(至少部分)奎纳克林和激动剂自身抑制性结合位点之间的重叠也表明激动剂自身抑制存在变构过程。对于这种替代机制,胆碱能激动剂分子首先需要分配到(或吸附到)脂质膜中,以进一步与其位于脂质 - 蛋白质界面的结合位点相互作用。