Rubio-Palis Y
División de Investigaciones, Escuela de Malariología y Saneamiento Ambiental, Dr Arnoldo Gabaldon, Maracay, Venezuela.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1996 Mar;12(1):91-6.
A 6-month study was carried out in northcentral Venezuela to evaluate the efficiency of the CDC light trap and the updraft ultraviolet (UV) light trap combined with carbon dioxide (CO2) or 1-octen-3-ol (or both) and human baits to sample outdoor Anopheles aquasalis and Anopheles albimanus populations. The human baits caught far more mosquitoes than did any of the other trapping methods. Comparing each of the trapping methods to the human bait catches, UV light trap + CO2 gave a closer correspondence of the ratio of An. aquasalis to An. albimanus compared with the ratio found in human baits than did any of the other trapping methods. The mean parous rate was significantly lower in human bait catches than in all of the trapping methods except for An. aquasalis in UV light trap with CO2. We consider the UV light trap with CO2 to be the most reliable substitute for human bait catches.
在委内瑞拉中北部进行了一项为期6个月的研究，以评估美国疾病控制与预防中心（CDC）诱蚊灯以及向上通风紫外线（UV）诱蚊灯与二氧化碳（CO2）或1-辛烯-3-醇（或两者）和人饵相结合，用于采集室外咸水按蚊和白纹伊蚊种群的效率。人饵捕获的蚊子比其他任何诱捕方法捕获的都多得多。将每种诱捕方法与用人饵捕获的结果进行比较，紫外线诱蚊灯 + CO2捕获的咸水按蚊与白纹伊蚊的比例，与用人饵捕获中发现的比例相比，比其他任何诱捕方法都更接近。人饵捕获的平均产蚊率显著低于除使用CO2的紫外线诱蚊灯捕获的咸水按蚊外的所有诱捕方法。我们认为使用CO2的紫外线诱蚊灯是用人饵捕获的最可靠替代方法。
