Dizon-Townson D, Kennedy K A, Dildy G A, Wu J, Egger M, Clark S L
Bess Kaiser Hospital, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Am J Perinatol. 1996 May;13(4):231-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994370.
Our purpose was: (1) to determine whether assessment of amniotic fluid index in high risk patients with a reactive nonstress test (NST) allowed improved recognition of the fetus at risk for perinatal morbidity than a reactive NST alone; and (2) to determine the optimal low amniotic fluid index (AFI) which should prompt clinical concern. The last NST performed within a week of delivery and amniotic fluid index were retro-spectively compared with various indices of perinatal morbidity. In fetuses with a reactive NST, decreasing AFI was directly correlated with a risk of 5-minute Apgar score of less than 7 and delivery for fetal distress. When various subgroupings of AFI were compared, 7 cm or greater appeared to have a better inverse correlation with the indices of morbidity than lower cut-off values. The addition of AFI assessment to the standard NST allows better prediction of perinatal morbidity than the NSTs alone. Seven centimeters appears to be a reasonable cut-off for clinical concern.
(1)确定对于无应激试验(NST)反应型的高危患者,评估羊水指数是否比单独的反应型NST能更好地识别有围产期发病风险的胎儿;(2)确定应引起临床关注的最佳低羊水指数(AFI)。回顾性比较分娩前一周内进行的最后一次NST及羊水指数与各种围产期发病指标。在NST反应型的胎儿中,AFI降低与5分钟阿氏评分低于7分及因胎儿窘迫而分娩的风险直接相关。当比较AFI的不同亚组时,7厘米或更高似乎比更低的临界值与发病指标有更好的负相关。在标准NST中增加AFI评估比单独的NST能更好地预测围产期发病情况。7厘米似乎是引起临床关注的合理临界值。