Ellis K J, Shypailo R J, Hergenroeder A, Perez M, Abrams S
USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Bone Miner Res. 1996 Jun;11(6):843-8. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650110616.
The aim of this study was to compare the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement of bone mass with an independent measure of body calcium obtained by neutron activation analysis (NAA). Total body bone mineral content (BMC) was measured using DXA in 46 subjects in the age range 5-47 years (17 children, 28 young women, and 1 adult male). Total body calcium (TBCa) was measured in the same subjects by in vivo NAA. The correlation between the two measures of bone mass was highly significant (BMC[g] = 3.22 x TBCa[g] - 51.4, r > 0.98, p < 0.0001, SEEBMC = 122.7 g). When BMC was the independent parameter, the SEETBCa was 37.5 g. Bland-Altman analysis indicated a mean difference of 2.8 g with a standard error +/- 4.7 g for TBCaNAA versus TBCaDXA when the BMC values were converted to TBCa. The relative change in bone mass (delta TBCa/delta BMC) for DXA was higher than that reported for dual-photon absorptiometry versus NAA. The findings presented in this study provide translational equations among the DXA and NAA measurements and for the conversion of total body BMC to TBCa in children and young adults.
本研究的目的是比较双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量的骨量与通过中子活化分析(NAA)获得的人体钙独立测量值。在46名年龄在5至47岁的受试者(17名儿童、28名年轻女性和1名成年男性)中使用DXA测量全身骨矿物质含量(BMC)。通过活体NAA测量同一受试者的全身钙(TBCa)。两种骨量测量方法之间的相关性非常显著(BMC[克]=3.22×TBCa[克]-51.4,r>0.98,p<0.0001,SEEBMC=122.7克)。当BMC为独立参数时,SEETBCa为37.5克。Bland-Altman分析表明,当将BMC值转换为TBCa时,TBCaNAA与TBCaDXA的平均差异为2.8克,标准误差为±4.7克。DXA的骨量相对变化(δTBCa/δBMC)高于双能光子吸收法与NAA的报道值。本研究中的结果提供了DXA和NAA测量之间的转换方程,以及儿童和年轻人全身BMC转换为TBCa的方程。