Konstadt S N, Reich D L, Rafferty T
Department of Anesthesiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY 10029, USA.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996 Apr;10(3):311-3. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(96)80088-7.
A test was developed that is based on intraoperative findings to evaluate knowledge of intraoperative echocardiography. This study examines the performance of attending anesthesiologists and residents at various levels of training in order to validate the test's ability to measure physician competence in intraoperative echocardiographic diagnosis.
This study was a prospective evaluation of a test of competence in transesophageal echocardiography.
Two university medical centers.
Volunteer anesthesia faculty and residents.
The participants took an echocardiographic examination that consisted of 34 "K"-type multiple-choice questions and a 45-second video-loop sequence for each question. The video sequences were chosen for their high quality and unambiguous representation of both normal and pathologic images obtained by transverse transesophageal echocardiographic imaging. The questions were written by experienced echocardiographers. The test was administered to 25 individuals at two academic institutions: 11 residents with minimal transesophageal echocardiography exposure and 14 faculty who were relatively experienced with transesophageal echocardiography. All of the residents repeated the examination at the end of their third clinical anesthesia year, which included transesophageal echocardiography training. The differences between the groups' scores were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. To correct for the multiple comparisons, p < 0.025 was deemed significant. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS. Before their transesophageal echocardiography training, the residents scored significantly lower than the faculty (p < 0.002). After 1 year of training, their scores significantly increased (p = 0.021), and their scores were not significantly different from the faculty level (p = 0.052).
Test performance differed according to level of experience. This suggests that the test is a valid measure of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography competence.
开发一种基于术中发现的测试,以评估术中超声心动图知识。本研究考察了不同培训水平的主治麻醉医师和住院医师的表现,以验证该测试衡量医师术中超声心动图诊断能力的有效性。
本研究是对经食管超声心动图能力测试的前瞻性评估。
两个大学医学中心。
志愿麻醉科教员和住院医师。
参与者进行了一项超声心动图检查,包括34道“K”型多项选择题,每题配有一段45秒的视频循环序列。这些视频序列因其高质量以及对经食管横向超声心动图成像获得的正常和病理图像的清晰呈现而被选中。问题由经验丰富的超声心动图专家编写。该测试在两个学术机构对25名个体进行:11名几乎没有经食管超声心动图检查经验的住院医师和14名经食管超声心动图检查经验相对丰富的教员。所有住院医师在其第三个临床麻醉学年末重复进行该检查,这一年包括经食管超声心动图培训。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验分析两组分数之间的差异。为校正多重比较,p<0.025被视为具有显著性。测量指标和主要结果。在接受经食管超声心动图培训之前,住院医师的得分显著低于教员(p<0.002)。经过1年的培训,他们的分数显著提高(p=0.021),且与教员水平无显著差异(p=0.052)。
测试表现因经验水平而异。这表明该测试是术中经食管超声心动图能力的有效衡量指标。