Suppr超能文献

咪达唑仑两种血浆浓度对冠状动脉手术中血流动力学及舒芬太尼需求量的影响。

The effect of midazolam at two plasma concentrations of hemodynamics and sufentanil requirement in coronary artery surgery.

作者信息

van der Maaten J M, Epema A H, Huet R C, Hennis P J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996 Apr;10(3):356-63. doi: 10.1016/s1053-0770(96)80097-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the hemodynamics and sufentanil requirement were compared at two midazolam target plasma concentrations in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

University hospital, single institution.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing CABG.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive midazolam at a target plasma concentration of 150 ng/mL (group 1; n = 10) or 300 ng/mL (group 2; n = 10). Sufentanil infusion was titrated to maintain hemodynamic stability, defined as mean arterial pressure within 15% of baseline values. All patients received preoperative beta-blocking agents. Arterial blood samples of midazolam and sufentanil were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography and radioimmunoassay, respectively.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The mean dose of sufentanil (7.5 +/- 1.7 microgram/kg in group 1 v 7.2 +/- 2.5 micrograms/kg in group 2) did not differ. There were no significant differences in hemodynamics between the groups in the period before or after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Before CPB, in two patients in each group, hypertension was controlled with sufentanil only. One patient in group 1 required a vasodilator in addition to sufentanil. No ischemic events occurred before CPB. After CPB, one patient in group 2 required a vasodilator to control hypertension. Two patients in group 2 required treatment with nitroglycerin for myocardial ischemia. Stable plasma concentrations of sufentanil and midazolam were obtained during and after CPB. The midazolam infusion was continued in both groups at a rate of 1.25 micrograms/kg/min during the first 4 postoperative hours. The time to awakening did not differ between the groups (100 +/- 58 minutes in group 1 v 173 +/- 147 minutes in group 2) nor did the plasma concentrations of midazolam (96 +/- 28 ng/mL v 108 +/- 42 ng/mL) at the time of awakening. Intraoperative awareness was not reported.

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing CABG, good hemodynamic control with a similar incidence of hemodynamic interventions was observed at midazolam target plasma concentrations of 150 and 300 ng/mL when coadministered with sufentanil. The sufentanil requirement was identical in both groups. This study suggests that a midazolam plasma concentration of 150 ng/mL is sufficient to provide satisfactory hemodynamic control and to avoid intraoperative awareness.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,比较了接受冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)患者在两种咪达唑仑目标血浆浓度下的血流动力学和舒芬太尼需求量。

设计

前瞻性随机研究。

地点

大学医院,单一机构。

参与者

接受CABG的患者。

干预措施

患者被随机分配接受目标血浆浓度为150 ng/mL的咪达唑仑(第1组;n = 10)或300 ng/mL的咪达唑仑(第2组;n = 10)。舒芬太尼输注量进行滴定以维持血流动力学稳定,定义为平均动脉压在基线值的15%以内。所有患者术前均接受β受体阻滞剂治疗。咪达唑仑和舒芬太尼的动脉血样本分别通过高效液相色谱法和放射免疫分析法进行分析。

测量指标和主要结果

舒芬太尼的平均剂量无差异(第1组为7.5±1.7微克/千克,第2组为7.2±2.5微克/千克)。在体外循环(CPB)前后两组的血流动力学无显著差异。在CPB前,每组各有两名患者仅用舒芬太尼控制高血压。第1组有一名患者除舒芬太尼外还需要一种血管扩张剂。CPB前未发生缺血事件。CPB后,第2组有一名患者需要血管扩张剂来控制高血压。第2组有两名患者需要用硝酸甘油治疗心肌缺血。在CPB期间和之后获得了稳定的舒芬太尼和咪达唑仑血浆浓度。术后前4小时两组均以1.25微克/千克/分钟的速率持续输注咪达唑仑。两组的苏醒时间无差异(第1组为100±58分钟,第2组为173±147分钟),苏醒时咪达唑仑的血浆浓度也无差异(分别为96±28 ng/mL和108±42 ng/mL)。未报告术中知晓情况。

结论

在接受CABG的患者中,当与舒芬太尼合用时,在咪达唑仑目标血浆浓度为150 ng/mL和300 ng/mL时观察到了良好的血流动力学控制,且血流动力学干预的发生率相似。两组的舒芬太尼需求量相同。本研究表明,咪达唑仑血浆浓度为150 ng/mL足以提供满意的血流动力学控制并避免术中知晓。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验