• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室辅助装置植入的胃肠道后果。

Gastrointestinal consequences of left ventricular assist device placement.

作者信息

el-Amir N G, Gardocki M, Levin H R, Markowitz D D, Greenspan R L, Catanese K A, Rose E A, Oz M C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 1996 May-Jun;42(3):150-3.

PMID:8725680
Abstract

Left ventricular assist devices effectively improve hemodynamic function and reverse renal and hepatic dysfunction; however, their effects upon the gastrointestinal (Gl) system have not been addressed. We evaluated Gl function in 27 left ventricular assist device recipients using interviews, Gl contrast studies, endoscopy, and 99mTc sulfur colloid studies of esophageal transit and gastric emptying. While on left ventricular assist device support (mean duration of 84 days), 19 patients reported early satiety and/or nausea, and 1 was unable to tolerate oral intake. Esophageal transit time (normal, < 10 sec) was borderline slow at 14 +/- 4 (mean +/- standard error of the mean) and gastric emptying (normal < 90 min) was prolonged (range of 106-506 min, mean = 283 +/- 69 min). In a 1-38 month follow-up, gastric function subjectively improved in all. Six patients had intraperitoneal device placement. One died of aspiration pneumonia secondary to small bowel obstruction, and one had prolonged inability to tolerate oral intake, which required feeding jejunostomy tube placement. The 21 patients with pre peritoneal placement of the device did not require Gl operative interventions and had no catastrophic Gl events; they had mild to no Gl complaints. Pre peritoneal placement may mitigate early satiety and obviate serious Gl complications.

摘要

左心室辅助装置可有效改善血流动力学功能,并逆转肾和肝功能障碍;然而,其对胃肠道系统的影响尚未得到研究。我们通过访谈、胃肠道造影研究、内镜检查以及用99m锝硫胶体进行食管通过和胃排空研究,对27例左心室辅助装置接受者的胃肠道功能进行了评估。在接受左心室辅助装置支持期间(平均持续时间84天),19例患者报告有早饱感和/或恶心,1例无法耐受经口摄入。食管通过时间(正常,<10秒)在14±4秒(均值±均值标准误)时接近缓慢,胃排空时间(正常<90分钟)延长(范围为106 - 506分钟,平均 = 283±69分钟)。在1 - 38个月的随访中,所有患者的胃功能主观上均有改善。6例患者进行了腹腔内装置植入。1例死于小肠梗阻继发的吸入性肺炎,1例长期无法耐受经口摄入,需要放置空肠造瘘喂养管。21例装置植入于腹膜前的患者无需进行胃肠道手术干预,也未发生严重的胃肠道事件;他们仅有轻度或无胃肠道不适。腹膜前植入可能减轻早饱感并避免严重的胃肠道并发症。

相似文献

1
Gastrointestinal consequences of left ventricular assist device placement.左心室辅助装置植入的胃肠道后果。
ASAIO J. 1996 May-Jun;42(3):150-3.
2
Improved survival and decreasing incidence of adverse events with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device as bridge-to-transplant therapy.使用HeartMate II左心室辅助装置作为桥接至移植治疗可提高生存率并降低不良事件发生率。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1227-34; discussion 1234-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.030.
3
Right heart dysfunction after left ventricular assist device implantation: a comparison of the pulsatile HeartMate I and axial-flow HeartMate II devices.左心室辅助装置植入术后的右心功能障碍:搏动性HeartMate I与轴流式HeartMate II装置的比较
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Sep;86(3):832-40; discussion 832-40. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.05.016.
4
Gastrointestinal bleeding rates in recipients of nonpulsatile and pulsatile left ventricular assist devices.非搏动性和搏动性左心室辅助装置接受者的胃肠道出血率
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jan;137(1):208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.07.032. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
5
Use of the percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with severe refractory cardiogenic shock as a bridge to long-term left ventricular assist device implantation.经皮左心室辅助装置在严重难治性心源性休克患者中作为长期左心室辅助装置植入的桥梁的应用。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Jan;27(1):106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.10.013.
6
Midterm follow-up of patients who underwent removal of a left ventricular assist device after cardiac recovery from end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy.终末期扩张型心肌病心脏恢复后接受左心室辅助装置移除术患者的中期随访。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Nov;120(5):843-53. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2000.108931.
7
Left ventricular assist device as bridge to transplantation does not adversely affect one-year heart transplantation survival.作为移植桥梁的左心室辅助装置不会对心脏移植一年生存率产生不利影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Sep;136(3):774-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.02.087.
8
Duration of left ventricular assist device support affects transplant survival.左心室辅助装置支持的持续时间会影响移植存活率。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996 Nov;15(11):1151-7.
9
Low thromboembolic risk for patients with the Heartmate II left ventricular assist device.使用Heartmate II左心室辅助装置的患者血栓栓塞风险较低。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Nov;136(5):1318-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.077. Epub 2008 Sep 14.
10
Immunologic sensitization in recipients of left ventricular assist devices.左心室辅助装置接受者的免疫致敏
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Mar;125(3):578-91. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2003.30.

引用本文的文献

1
Gastrointestinal Symptoms from Left-Ventricular Assist Device External Compression of the Gastric Lumen.左心室辅助装置对胃腔的外部压迫导致的胃肠道症状。
ACG Case Rep J. 2016 Dec 7;3(4):e180. doi: 10.14309/crj.2016.153. eCollection 2016 Aug.