Gerrow J D, Boyd M A, Doyle G, Scott D
Faculty of Dentistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., Canada.
J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Jun;75(6):675-80. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90256-5.
The potential causes of reliability and validity problems with traditional methods of evaluating a student's clinical prosthodontic skills are reviewed. Practical methods of evaluating critical skills in a reliable and valid way are presented. These methods include clinical tests using written criteria and anonymous examiners, skills assessment by faculty members, patient-based written examinations, and bell ringer examinations.