• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病足感染。10种口服抗菌药物对连续病例分离出的细菌的细菌学及活性研究

Diabetic foot infections. Bacteriology and activity of 10 oral antimicrobial agents against bacteria isolated from consecutive cases.

作者信息

Goldstein E J, Citron D M, Nesbit C A

机构信息

R.M. Alden Research Laboratory, Santa Monica Hospital Medical Center, California 90404, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 1996 Jun;19(6):638-41. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.6.638.

DOI:10.2337/diacare.19.6.638
PMID:8725864
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the relative frequency of bacterial isolates cultured from community-acquired foot infections and assess their comparative in vitro susceptibility to sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, and eight other commonly used oral antimicrobial agents.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This is a prospective study in which the infected wounds of 25 consecutive diabetic patients seen by one of the authors were cultured as they entered the hospital. Isolates were stored and tested for susceptibility to 10 oral antimicrobial agents using the agar dilution method.

RESULTS

Staphylococcus aurcus was the most common isolate (76% of patients), including methicillin-resistant S. aurcus (MRSA) in 5 of 25 (20%) patient wounds. Streptococci, enterococci, Enterobacteriaceae, and anaerobes were also present in > or = 40% of patient wounds. Sparfloxacin and levofloxacin were the most active agents tested with activity against > or = 88% of isolates. Isolates resistant to sparfloxacin and levofloxacin included MRSA, enterococci, and some anaerobes. When analyzed by prior exposure to antibiotics, patients who had previously received oral antibiotics were more likely to have MRSA, enterococci, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated and less likely to have Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobes isolated from their wounds.

CONCLUSIONS

MRSA and enterococci are now a common cause of diabetic foot infections, and the increased prevalence may be due to antimicrobial use. These wounds may require use of combined antimicrobial therapy for initial outpatient management. The new fluoroquinolones, sparfloxacin and levofloxacin, were the most active oral agents tested.

摘要

目的

研究从社区获得性足部感染中培养出的细菌分离株的相对频率,并评估它们对司帕沙星、左氧氟沙星和其他8种常用口服抗菌药物的体外敏感性。

研究设计与方法

这是一项前瞻性研究,由一位作者对连续25例糖尿病患者入院时感染的伤口进行培养。分离株保存后,采用琼脂稀释法检测对10种口服抗菌药物的敏感性。

结果

金黄色葡萄球菌是最常见的分离株(占患者的76%),25例患者伤口中有5例(20%)为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。链球菌、肠球菌、肠杆菌科细菌和厌氧菌在≥40%的患者伤口中也有发现。司帕沙星和左氧氟沙星是检测的活性最高的药物,对≥88%的分离株有活性。对司帕沙星和左氧氟沙星耐药的分离株包括MRSA、肠球菌和一些厌氧菌。按既往是否使用过抗生素分析,既往接受过口服抗生素治疗的患者伤口中更易分离出MRSA、肠球菌和铜绿假单胞菌,而分离出肠杆菌科细菌和厌氧菌的可能性较小。

结论

MRSA和肠球菌现在是糖尿病足感染的常见病因,其患病率增加可能与抗菌药物的使用有关。这些伤口在初始门诊治疗时可能需要联合使用抗菌药物。新型氟喹诺酮类药物司帕沙星和左氧氟沙星是检测的活性最高的口服药物。

相似文献

1
Diabetic foot infections. Bacteriology and activity of 10 oral antimicrobial agents against bacteria isolated from consecutive cases.糖尿病足感染。10种口服抗菌药物对连续病例分离出的细菌的细菌学及活性研究
Diabetes Care. 1996 Jun;19(6):638-41. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.6.638.
2
Bacteriology of moderate-to-severe diabetic foot infections and in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents.中重度糖尿病足感染的细菌学及抗菌药物的体外活性
J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Sep;45(9):2819-28. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00551-07. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
3
Comparative in vitro antimicrobial activity of a novel quinolone, garenoxacin, against aerobic and anaerobic microbial isolates recovered from general, vascular, cardiothoracic and otolaryngologic surgical patients.新型喹诺酮类药物加替沙星对从普通外科、血管外科、心胸外科和耳鼻喉科手术患者中分离出的需氧和厌氧微生物菌株的体外抗菌活性比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Nov;56(5):872-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki348. Epub 2005 Sep 26.
4
In vitro activity of ceftobiprole against aerobic and anaerobic strains isolated from diabetic foot infections.头孢比普对从糖尿病足感染中分离出的需氧菌和厌氧菌的体外活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Nov;50(11):3959-62. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00722-06. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
5
In vitro activities of doripenem and six comparator drugs against 423 aerobic and anaerobic bacterial isolates from infected diabetic foot wounds.多黏菌素B及六种对照药物对423株来自感染性糖尿病足伤口的需氧和厌氧细菌分离株的体外活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Feb;52(2):761-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01128-07. Epub 2007 Dec 10.
6
In vitro activities of dalbavancin and 12 other agents against 329 aerobic and anaerobic gram-positive isolates recovered from diabetic foot infections.达巴万星及其他12种药物对从糖尿病足感染中分离出的329株需氧和厌氧革兰氏阳性菌的体外活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Aug;50(8):2875-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00286-06.
7
Comparative in vitro activity of ceftaroline, ceftaroline-avibactam, and other antimicrobial agents against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria cultured from infected diabetic foot wounds.比较头孢洛林、头孢洛林-阿维巴坦和其他抗菌药物对从感染性糖尿病足创面培养的需氧菌和厌氧菌的体外活性。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Jul;76(3):347-51. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.03.019. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
8
Comparative in vitro activities of ertapenem against bacterial pathogens from patients with acute pelvic infection.厄他培南对急性盆腔感染患者分离的细菌病原体的体外活性比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Nov;50(5):735-41. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf203.
9
[In vitro activities of levofloxacin and other antibiotics against fresh clinical isolates].左氧氟沙星及其他抗生素对新鲜临床分离株的体外活性
Jpn J Antibiot. 1999 Sep;52(9):571-84.
10
Comparative in vitro activities of azithromycin, Bay y 3118, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, and 11 other oral antimicrobial agents against 194 aerobic and anaerobic bite wound isolates.阿奇霉素、拜耳Y 3118、左氧氟沙星、司帕沙星及其他11种口服抗菌剂对194株需氧和厌氧咬伤伤口分离菌株的体外比较活性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 May;39(5):1097-100. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.5.1097.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and bacteriological profile of diabetic foot infections in a tertiary care.三级护理中糖尿病足感染的临床和细菌学特征。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Jun 16;13(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00406-y.
2
Susceptibility of monomicrobial or polymicrobial biofilms derived from infected diabetic foot ulcers to topical or systemic antibiotics in vitro.体外研究感染性糖尿病足溃疡来源的单一微生物或混合微生物生物膜对局部或全身抗生素的敏感性。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 18;15(2):e0228704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228704. eCollection 2020.
3
The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among diabetic patients: a meta-analysis.
耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌在糖尿病患者中的流行率:一项荟萃分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2019 Aug;56(8):907-921. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01301-0. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
4
The Significant Association between Polymicrobial Diabetic Foot Infection and Its Severity and Outcomes.多种微生物引起的糖尿病足感染与其严重程度及预后之间的显著关联。
Malays J Med Sci. 2019 Jan;26(1):107-114. doi: 10.21315/mjms2019.26.1.10. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
5
Epidemiology of diabetic foot infections in a reference tertiary hospital in India.印度一家参考三级医院糖尿病足感染的流行病学
Braz J Microbiol. 2018 Apr-Jun;49(2):401-406. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
6
Effectiveness of a polyhexanide irrigation solution on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in a porcine wound model.聚己双胍溶液对猪创伤模型中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的有效性。
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):937-944. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12734. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
7
Emergence of multi drug resistant bacteria in diabetic patients with lower limb wounds.糖尿病下肢伤口患者中多重耐药菌的出现。
Indian J Med Res. 2014 Sep;140(3):435-7.
8
Diversity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from residents of 26 nursing homes in Orange County, California.加利福尼亚州奥兰治县 26 家养老院居民分离的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的多样性。
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Nov;51(11):3788-95. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01708-13. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
9
Global fluoroquinolone resistance epidemiology and implictions for clinical use.全球氟喹诺酮类药物耐药性流行病学及其临床应用意义
Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2012;2012:976273. doi: 10.1155/2012/976273. Epub 2012 Oct 14.
10
From ulcer to infection: an update on clinical practice and adjunctive treatments of diabetic foot ulcers.从溃疡到感染:糖尿病足溃疡临床实践和辅助治疗的最新进展。
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2012 Oct;14(5):540-50. doi: 10.1007/s11908-012-0283-3.