Klug B, Bisgaard H
Department of Pediatrics, National University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996 May;21(5):290-300. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199605)21:5<290::AID-PPUL4>3.0.CO;2-R.
This study evaluated three techniques for testing of lung function in young awake children. We compared measurements by the forced or impulse oscillation technique (IOS), the interrupter technique (IT), and transcutaneous measurements of oxygen (tcPo2) with concomitant measurements of specific airway resistance (sRaw) during methacholine challenge in 20 stable asthmatic children, 2-4 years old. Measurements were performed with all techniques after each dose of methacholine and after inhalation of a bronchodilator. Measurements were carried out during tidal breathing using a face-mask with a built-in mouthpiece. The ranking of sensitivity was as follows: sRaw > IOS, respiratory reactance at 5 Hz (Xrs5) > tcPo2 > interrupter resistance (Rint) > IOS, respiratory resistance at 5 Hz (Rrs5). The sensitivity of sRaw and Xrs5 was not significantly different, but both were significantly more sensitive than Rint and Rrs5; the sensitivity of tcPo2, Rint, and Rrs5 was not significantly different. Measurements in eight of the subjects performed during an episode of acute asthma yielded comparable results in regard to the sensitivity of the techniques. Measurements improved significantly after bronchodilator administration; however, the response to bronchodilator tended to be less during acute asthma and was best demonstrated by a deterioration of tcPo2. All the evaluated techniques reliably reflect short-term changes in respiratory function and can provide clinically useful estimates of airway function. The techniques are non-invasive, are not dependent on the active co-operation or sedation of the subjects, and therefore are well suited for routine use in young children.
本研究评估了三种用于检测清醒幼儿肺功能的技术。我们在20名2至4岁稳定期哮喘儿童进行乙酰甲胆碱激发试验期间,比较了用力或脉冲振荡技术(IOS)、阻断器技术(IT)以及经皮氧分压(tcPo2)测量值与特定气道阻力(sRaw)的同步测量值。在每次给予乙酰甲胆碱后以及吸入支气管扩张剂后,使用所有技术进行测量。测量在潮式呼吸期间通过带有内置咬嘴的面罩进行。敏感性排序如下:sRaw > IOS、5赫兹时的呼吸电抗(Xrs5)> tcPo2 > 阻断器阻力(Rint)> IOS、5赫兹时的呼吸阻力(Rrs5)。sRaw和Xrs5的敏感性无显著差异,但两者均显著比Rint和Rrs5更敏感;tcPo2、Rint和Rrs5的敏感性无显著差异。在8名受试者急性哮喘发作期间进行的测量,就这些技术的敏感性而言得出了可比结果。支气管扩张剂给药后测量结果显著改善;然而,急性哮喘期间对支气管扩张剂的反应往往较小,且tcPo2恶化最能体现这一点。所有评估技术均能可靠反映呼吸功能的短期变化,并能提供临床上有用的气道功能评估。这些技术是非侵入性的,不依赖受试者的主动配合或镇静,因此非常适合在幼儿中常规使用。