Aarden E M, Nijweide P J, van der Plas A, Alblas M J, Mackie E J, Horton M A, Helfrich M H
Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leiden, the Netherlands.
Bone. 1996 Apr;18(4):305-13. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(96)00010-5.
Different functions have been proposed for osteocytes over time, but it is now generally accepted that their most important task lies in the sensing of strain caused by mechanical loading on bone. The fact that mechanical strain can be sensed as deformation of the extracellular matrix or as fluid shear stress along the cell, in the space between cell membrane and extracellular matrix, requires that osteocytes have close (specialized) contact with the bone matrix. We studied to which extracellular matrix proteins isolated chicken osteocytes adhere and whether this adhesion is mediated by specific cell adhesion receptors called integrins. The adhesive properties of the osteocytes were compared with that of osteoblasts. Osteocytes (and osteoblasts) adhere to the same substrates (i.e., collagen types I and II, collagen fibers, osteopontin, osteonectin, fibronectin, fibrinogen, thrombospondin, and laminin). Cell spreading varied between substrates, from all cells rounded on thrombospondin to all cells fully spread out on osteopontin, osteonectin, vitronectin, fibronectin, fibrinogen, and laminin. The percentage of osteocytes adhered was equivalent to that of osteoblasts adhered on all substrates except osteopontin and vitronectin, where osteocytes adhered less. The adhesion of osteocytes and osteoblasts to osteopontin, osteonectin, vitronectin, and fibrinogen was strongly inhibited, and to fibronectin and laminin moderately, by an RGD peptide. No RGD inhibition was found on collagen. An antibody against chicken integrin alpha v beta 3, the monoclonal antibody (MAb) 23C6, did not interfere with the adhesion of osteocytes and osteoblasts to matrix proteins, whereas an MAb against chicken integrin subunit beta 1 (CSAT) strongly inhibited adhesion to all substrates. Labeling with osteocyte-specific MAbs (OB7.3, OB37.4, and OB37.11) also did not hinder the adhesion of osteocytes to collagen type I, vitronectin, and osteopontin. Adhesion sites on osteocytes were small compared with the large adhesion plaques of osteoblasts, as demonstrated by interference reflection microscopy and immunocytochemically by staining for vinculin. Osteocyte adhesion is analogous to osteoblast adhesion with regard to the range of extracellular matrix proteins to which they adhere. The adhesion is mediated by the integrin subunit beta 1, but other integrins or nonintegrin adhesion receptors are also involved. Osteocytes make contact with the extracellular matrix via small attachment points which colocalize with vinculin. This connection between the bone matrix and the cytoskeleton may be important for osteocytic sensing of mechanical strain, as it supplies a transduction route of extracellular (mechanical) signals into intracellular messages.
随着时间的推移,人们对骨细胞提出了不同的功能,但现在普遍认为其最重要的任务在于感知骨骼机械负荷引起的应变。机械应变可以被感知为细胞外基质的变形或沿着细胞膜与细胞外基质之间空间中的细胞的流体剪切应力,这一事实要求骨细胞与骨基质有紧密(专门化)的接触。我们研究了分离的鸡骨细胞粘附于哪些细胞外基质蛋白,以及这种粘附是否由称为整合素的特定细胞粘附受体介导。将骨细胞的粘附特性与成骨细胞的进行了比较。骨细胞(和成骨细胞)粘附于相同的底物(即I型和II型胶原、胶原纤维、骨桥蛋白、骨连接蛋白、纤连蛋白、纤维蛋白原、血小板反应蛋白和层粘连蛋白)。细胞铺展在不同底物之间有所不同,从在血小板反应蛋白上所有细胞呈圆形到在骨桥蛋白、骨连接蛋白、玻连蛋白、纤连蛋白、纤维蛋白原和层粘连蛋白上所有细胞完全铺展。除骨桥蛋白和玻连蛋白外,在所有底物上粘附的骨细胞百分比与粘附的成骨细胞百分比相当,在骨桥蛋白和玻连蛋白上骨细胞粘附较少。RGD肽强烈抑制骨细胞和成骨细胞对骨桥蛋白、骨连接蛋白、玻连蛋白和纤维蛋白原的粘附,对纤连蛋白和层粘连蛋白的粘附则有中度抑制。未发现对胶原的RGD抑制作用。针对鸡整合素αvβ3的抗体,单克隆抗体(MAb)23C6,不干扰骨细胞和成骨细胞对基质蛋白的粘附,而针对鸡整合素亚基β1(CSAT)的单克隆抗体强烈抑制对所有底物的粘附。用骨细胞特异性单克隆抗体(OB7.3、OB37.4和OB37.11)标记也不妨碍骨细胞对I型胶原、玻连蛋白和骨桥蛋白的粘附。与成骨细胞的大粘附斑相比,骨细胞上的粘附位点较小,这通过干涉反射显微镜和免疫细胞化学检测纽蛋白染色得以证明。就它们粘附的细胞外基质蛋白范围而言,骨细胞粘附类似于成骨细胞粘附。这种粘附由整合素亚基β1介导,但也涉及其他整合素或非整合素粘附受体。骨细胞通过与纽蛋白共定位的小附着点与细胞外基质接触。骨基质与细胞骨架之间的这种连接对于骨细胞对机械应变的感知可能很重要,因为它提供了细胞外(机械)信号转化为细胞内信息的转导途径。