• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牛肉大理石花纹预期后代差异的应用:II. 胴体与适口性性状。

Use of expected progeny differences for marbling in beef: II. Carcass and palatability traits.

作者信息

Gwartney B L, Calkins C R, Rasby R J, Stock R A, Vieselmeyer B A, Gosey J A

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 1996 May;74(5):1014-22. doi: 10.2527/1996.7451014x.

DOI:10.2527/1996.7451014x
PMID:8726733
Abstract

A 2-yr study was conducted to determine the effect of EPD for marbling on marbling score, palatability traits, and carcass fatness in beef. Steer (n = 122) and heifer (n = 123) carcasses were obtained by mating Angus bulls having a high ( > .4) or low ( < -.16) EPD for marbling to MARC II cows (1/4 Angus, 1/4 Hereford, 1/4 Simmental, and 1/4 Gelbvieh). Carcass traits, composition of primals, quarters, and sides, palatability, and shear force data were obtained and adjusted to the mean number of days on feed, equal marbling score (Small50), fat thickness (1.0 cm), and carcass weight (318 kg) end points. Steer carcasses from the high marbling EPD group, adjusted to the mean number of days on feed, had significantly more marbling (P < .01) and less subcutaneous fat in the side and the hindquarter (P < .10) than their low marbling EPD counterparts. Adjusting steers to Small50 marbling produced smaller longissimus muscle area (by 5 cm2), less fat thickness (1.15 vs 1.28 cm), and lighter side weights (306 vs 333 kg) for high marbling vs low marbling EPD groups, indicating a faster rate of marbling deposition. Similar relationships of a greater magnitude were found for heifers, perhaps because the heifers were older than the steers at slaughter. No differences in taste panel ratings or shear force values were noted among steer carcasses. Heifer carcasses from the high marbling EPD group had better (P < .05) ratings for juiciness, muscle fiber tenderness, and overall tenderness than the low marbling EPD group heifers. These results indicate that it is possible, using existing genetic resources, to maintain marbling score and decrease fat in other depots of the carcass without compromising palatability.

摘要

进行了一项为期两年的研究,以确定牛肉大理石花纹的预期 progeny 差异(EPD)对大理石花纹评分、适口性特征和胴体脂肪含量的影响。通过将具有高(>.4)或低(<-.16)大理石花纹 EPD 的安格斯公牛与 MARC II 母牛(1/4 安格斯、1/4 赫里福德、1/4 西门塔尔和 1/4 吉尔维耶)交配,获得了阉牛(n = 122)和小母牛(n = 123)的胴体。获取了胴体性状、主要切块、四分体和半边的组成、适口性和剪切力数据,并将其调整到平均饲养天数、相等的大理石花纹评分(Small50)、脂肪厚度(1.0 厘米)和胴体重量(318 千克)的终点。与低大理石花纹 EPD 的阉牛胴体相比,高大理石花纹 EPD 组的阉牛胴体在调整到平均饲养天数后,大理石花纹显著更多(P <.01),半边和后躯的皮下脂肪更少(P <.10)。将阉牛调整到 Small50 大理石花纹后,高大理石花纹 EPD 组与低大理石花纹 EPD 组相比,背最长肌面积更小(小 5 平方厘米)、脂肪厚度更薄(1.15 厘米对 1.28 厘米)、半边重量更轻(306 千克对 333 千克),这表明大理石花纹沉积速度更快。在小母牛中发现了更大程度的类似关系,可能是因为小母牛在屠宰时比阉牛年龄更大。阉牛胴体之间在味觉评分或剪切力值方面没有差异。高大理石花纹 EPD 组的小母牛胴体在多汁性、肌纤维嫩度和总体嫩度方面的评分优于低大理石花纹 EPD 组的小母牛(P <.05)。这些结果表明,利用现有的遗传资源,有可能在不影响适口性的情况下,保持大理石花纹评分并减少胴体其他部位的脂肪。

相似文献

1
Use of expected progeny differences for marbling in beef: II. Carcass and palatability traits.牛肉大理石花纹预期后代差异的应用:II. 胴体与适口性性状。
J Anim Sci. 1996 May;74(5):1014-22. doi: 10.2527/1996.7451014x.
2
Use of expected progeny differences for marbling in beef: I. Production traits.
J Anim Sci. 1996 May;74(5):1009-13. doi: 10.2527/1996.7451009x.
3
Feedlot performance, carcass traits, and palatability traits of Hereford and Hereford x Brahman steers.赫里福德牛以及赫里福德牛与婆罗门牛杂交阉公牛的育肥性能、胴体性状和适口性性状。
J Anim Sci. 1995 Dec;73(12):3613-20. doi: 10.2527/1995.73123613x.
4
Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VI): carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits.牛的生物学类型特征(第六轮):胴体、产量及背最长肌适口性性状
J Anim Sci. 2004 Apr;82(4):1177-89. doi: 10.2527/2004.8241177x.
5
Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VII): Carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits.牛的生物学类型特征(第七周期):胴体、产量及背最长肌适口性性状
J Anim Sci. 2005 Jan;83(1):196-207. doi: 10.2527/2005.831196x.
6
Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle IV): carcass traits and longissimus palatability.牛的生物学类型特征(第四周期):胴体性状和背最长肌适口性
J Anim Sci. 1996 May;74(5):1023-35. doi: 10.2527/1996.7451023x.
7
Genetic parameters for carcass traits and their live animal indicators in Simmental cattle.西门塔尔牛胴体性状及其活体指标的遗传参数
J Anim Sci. 2003 Jun;81(6):1427-33. doi: 10.2527/2003.8161427x.
8
Effects of selection for ultrasound intramuscular fat percentage in Angus bulls on carcass traits of progeny.安格斯公牛超声测定肌内脂肪百分比选择对后代胴体性状的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2002 Aug;80(8):2017-22. doi: 10.2527/2002.8082017x.
9
Growth implants reduced tenderness of steaks from steers and heifers with different genetic potentials for growth and marbling.生长植入物降低了具有不同生长和大理石花纹遗传潜力的阉牛和小母牛牛排的嫩度。
J Anim Sci. 2009 Jan;87(1):269-74. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1256. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
10
Genetic relationships between sex-specific traits in beef cattle: mature weight, weight adjusted for body condition score, height and body condition score of cows, and carcass traits of their steer relatives.肉牛性别特异性性状之间的遗传关系:成年体重、根据体况评分调整后的体重、母牛的身高和体况评分,以及其阉牛后代的胴体性状。
J Anim Sci. 2004 Mar;82(3):647-53. doi: 10.2527/2004.823647x.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of nutrigenomic based precision management model for Hanwoo steers.韩牛育肥期基于营养基因组学的精准管理模型的开发。
J Anim Sci Technol. 2023 May;65(3):596-610. doi: 10.5187/jast.2023.e38. Epub 2023 May 31.
2
The impact of selection using residual average daily gain and marbling EPDs on growth, performance, and carcass traits in Angus steers1.利用残留日均增重和大理石花纹 EPD 进行选择对安格斯阉牛生长性能、生产性能和胴体性状的影响 1 。
J Anim Sci. 2019 May 30;97(6):2450-2459. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz124.
3
Variation of meat quality parameters due to conformation and fat class in limousin bulls slaughtered at 25 to 27 months of age.
25至27月龄利木赞公牛因体型和脂肪等级导致的肉质参数变化
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2013 May;26(5):716-22. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12525.