Suppr超能文献

青春期大鼠桶状皮质中经验依赖性突触增强和抑制的时间进程。

Time course of experience-dependent synaptic potentiation and depression in barrel cortex of adolescent rats.

作者信息

Glazewski S, Fox K

机构信息

Department of Physiology, University of Minnesota 55455, USA.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1996 Apr;75(4):1714-29. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.4.1714.

Abstract
  1. Plasticity could be induced in (S1) barrel cortex of adolescent rats by reducing the complement of vibrissae on one side of the muzzle to a single whisker for a period of 7, 20, or 60 days. The effect of deprivation was assessed by quantitatively by measuring cortical responses to stimulation of the spared and regrown deprived vibrissae. Vibrissa responses were evoked using a standard stimulus generated by an electromechanical stimulator and measured using poststimulus time histogram analysis. 2. Cells located in layers II/III were found to be plastic beyond postnatal day 28 (P28), whereas cells located in layer IV were not. The vibrissa dominance distribution was shifted significantly toward the spared vibrissa after 7, 20, and 60 days of deprivation for cells located in layers II/III of barrel columns surrounding the D1 column (P < 0.0001, 2-factor analysis of variance). The vibrissa dominance distribution did not shift significantly for cells located in layer IV of surrounding barrels for any of the durations of deprivation tested (P > 0.1). After 7 days of deprivation, 37% of the cells located in layers II/III of the columns deprived vibrissae showed greater responses to the spared vibrissae than to their deprived principal vibrissa, compared with 11% in normally reared adolescent animals and 3% in adults. The percentage of cells dominated by the spared vibrissa was 65% after 20 days of deprivation and 43% after 60 days. 3. For cells located in layers II/III, short-term deprivation (7 days) caused a decrease in the absolute magnitude of response to stimulation of the deprived vibrissa (reduction to approximately 28% of control levels). However, no change could be detected in the spared (D1) vibrissa input to the same deprived columns. Therefore the increase in D1 dominance registered in the deprived columns was mainly due to a decrease in principal vibrissa response and no change in the spared D1 vibrissa response. 4. The first increase in spared vibrissa response was seen after 20 days of deprivation. The response magnitude cells located in layers II/III increased to 70% above control levels. Responses to deprived vibrissa stimulation were depressed at 20 days of deprivation (reduction to 35% of control), implying that the vibrissa dominance shift at 20 days was due to both an increase in spared vibrissa response and a decrease in deprived vibrissa response. 5. The spared vibrissa response was increased after 60 days of deprivation (110% above control) in both near and far halves of the barrel columns surrounding D1. On average, the deprived vibrissa response was depressed at 60 days (84% of control), although less than at 20 or 7 days, because of recovery of responsiveness in the far half of the deprived barrel column. Layer II/III cells located in the half of the barrel column farthest from the spared D1 barrel column showed normal levels of deprived vibrissa input, whereas cells located in the half of the barrel column closest to the spared D1 barrel column still exhibited depressed levels of deprived vibrissa input (54% of control). 6. Control experiments suggested that depression of the deprived vibrissa response could not be explained by nonspecific effects. Depression was not a function of animal's age, because normally reared P28 and adult animals showed similar principal vibrissa response levels. It was not a result of nonspecific depression of cortical responses. because the decreased response only occurred in cells of deprived barrel columns and not spared barrel columns (recorded in the same animals). Depression was not due to altered vibrissa mechanics, because the spared vibrissa response was similarly depressed in animals in which the vibrissae had been trimmed rather than removed. Finally, depression was input specific at 7 and 20 days, because only the deprived vibrissa responses were depressed, whereas spared vibrissa responses were either at control levels or at elevated levels for the same cells. 7.
摘要
  1. 通过将幼鼠口鼻一侧的触须数量减少至单根触须,持续7天、20天或60天,可在(初级体感皮层S1)桶状皮层诱导可塑性。通过定量测量皮层对保留和重新生长的被剥夺触须刺激的反应,评估剥夺的效果。使用机电刺激器产生的标准刺激诱发触须反应,并使用刺激后时间直方图分析进行测量。2. 发现位于II/III层的细胞在出生后第28天(P28)之后仍具有可塑性,而位于IV层的细胞则没有。对于围绕D1柱的桶状柱II/III层中的细胞,在剥夺7天、20天和60天后,触须优势分布显著向保留的触须转移(P < 0.0001,双因素方差分析)。在所测试的任何剥夺持续时间内,对于周围桶状柱IV层中的细胞,触须优势分布均未显著转移(P > 0.1)。剥夺7天后,在被剥夺触须的柱II/III层中,37%的细胞对保留触须的反应大于对其被剥夺的主要触须的反应,而在正常饲养的幼鼠中这一比例为11%,在成年鼠中为3%。剥夺20天后,由保留触须主导的细胞百分比为65%,60天后为43%。3. 对于位于II/III层的细胞,短期剥夺(7天)导致对被剥夺触须刺激的反应绝对幅度降低(降至对照水平的约28%)。然而,在同一被剥夺柱中,未检测到保留(D1)触须输入的变化。因此,在被剥夺柱中记录到的D1优势增加主要是由于主要触须反应的降低,而保留的D1触须反应没有变化。4. 在剥夺20天后首次观察到保留触须反应的增加。位于II/III层的细胞反应幅度增加至对照水平以上70%。在剥夺20天时,对被剥夺触须刺激的反应受到抑制(降至对照的35%),这意味着20天时触须优势转移是由于保留触须反应增加和被剥夺触须反应降低共同导致的。5. 在围绕D1的桶状柱的近半部分和远半部分,剥夺60天后保留触须反应均增加(高于对照110%)。平均而言,在60天时被剥夺触须反应受到抑制(为对照的84%),尽管比20天或7天时小,这是因为被剥夺桶状柱远半部分的反应性有所恢复。位于桶状柱离保留的D1桶状柱最远的一半中的II/III层细胞显示出正常水平的被剥夺触须输入,而位于桶状柱离保留的D1桶状柱最近的一半中的细胞仍表现出被剥夺触须输入的抑制水平(为对照的54%)。6. 对照实验表明,被剥夺触须反应的抑制不能用非特异性效应来解释。抑制不是动物年龄的函数,因为正常饲养的P28动物和成年动物表现出相似的主要触须反应水平。它不是皮层反应非特异性抑制的结果,因为反应降低仅发生在被剥夺桶状柱的细胞中,而不是保留桶状柱的细胞中(在同一动物中记录)。抑制不是由于触须力学改变,因为在触须被修剪而非移除的动物中,保留触须反应也同样受到抑制。最后,在7天和20天时抑制是输入特异性的,因为对于相同的细胞,只有被剥夺触须的反应受到抑制,而保留触须的反应要么处于对照水平,要么升高。7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验