Macías-Hernández A E, Hernández-Ramos I, Muñoz-Barrett J M, Vargas-Salado E, Guerrero-Martínez F J, Medina-Valdovinos H, Hernández-Hernández J, Ponce-de-León-Rosales S
Facultad de Medicina de León, Universidad de Guanajuato, México.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996 May;17(5):276-80. doi: 10.1086/647295.
To evaluate the potential contribution of "extrinsic" contamination of intravenous fluids in hospital bacteremia and infection.
Prospective cross-sectional survey of infusate contamination, December 1992 to December 1993.
A pediatric department (1,500 admissions per year) in a general, urban teaching hospital, serving low-income patients. SAMPLES AND PATIENTS: Infusate samples (0.5 to 1.0 mL) from the injection port used by the staff were taken for cultures from all febrile or septic patients in hospital wards. At least four samples were taken each day; if no febrile or septic patients were available, other patients were sampled at convenience.
A 6.8% positive culture rate (87 contaminates in 1,277 infusates) was obtained, without significant differences among the wards. Gram-negative organisms were recovered from 56 samples (62.9%), mainly of the tribe Klebsielleae (56.1%). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated in 30 samples (33.7%). There was no significant difference between the febrile-septic group and the asymptomatic group in the rate of infusate contamination (P = .59). In eight patients, the same organisms were recovered from infusate and blood culture. The overall bacteremia rate was 2.5 per 100 discharges.
Compared to previous reports, higher infusate contamination rates and different organisms (mainly gram-negative) were observed. In hospitals of underdeveloped countries, nosocomial infection control frequently is disregarded. Infusate contamination may be common and could lead to gram-negative bacteremia. In such settings, it seems advisable to perform surveillance studies to identify infusate contamination, because a single infusate contamination could be a signal for an epidemic.
评估静脉输液“外在”污染在医院菌血症和感染中的潜在影响。
1992年12月至1993年12月对输注液污染情况进行的前瞻性横断面调查。
一家城市综合教学医院的儿科(每年收治1500名患者),服务低收入患者。
从医院病房所有发热或败血症患者使用的注射端口采集输注液样本(0.5至1.0毫升)进行培养。每天至少采集四个样本;如果没有发热或败血症患者,则方便时对其他患者进行采样。
培养阳性率为6.8%(1277份输注液中有87份污染),各病房之间无显著差异。从56份样本(62.9%)中分离出革兰氏阴性菌,主要是克雷伯菌属(56.1%)。凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌在30份样本(33.7%)中被分离出来。发热-败血症组和无症状组在输注液污染率方面无显著差异(P = 0.59)。在8名患者中,从输注液和血培养中分离出相同的微生物。总体菌血症发生率为每100例出院患者中有2.5例。
与之前的报告相比,观察到更高的输注液污染率和不同的微生物(主要是革兰氏阴性菌)。在欠发达国家的医院,医院感染控制常常被忽视。输注液污染可能很常见,并可能导致革兰氏阴性菌血症。在这种情况下,进行监测研究以识别输注液污染似乎是可取的,因为单次输注液污染可能是疫情的信号。