Gaucher-Peslherbe P L
Institut pour l'Etude de la Statique et de la Dynamique du Corps Humain (IESDCH), Geneva, Switzerland.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1996 Mar-Apr;19(3):178-84.
Until after the workshop on the research status of Spinal Manipulative Therapy at the National Institute of Neurological and Communicating Disorders and Strokes (NINCDS) in Bethesda, Maryland, in 1975, research had been a very elusive yet critical part of chiropractic evolution. In the past, chiropractic education emphasized basic sciences for legitimacy. To increase their competitive edge, chiropractors all too frequently looked to medical research rather than conducting research of their own. A few exceptionally gifted individuals and agencies within the profession developed new paradigms, improved modalities, and clinical mastery. Very little descriptive information has been made available to assess either these individuals or their achievements. With more than half the profession having less than 10 yr of practice, it becomes necessary to kindle a reappraisal of what once was in the particular area of chiropractic research. The case of Fred Illi has been chosen to illustrate the inherent difficulties that faced anyone bold enough to try and coherent enough to be successful.
直到1975年在马里兰州贝塞斯达的国家神经疾病与中风研究所(NINCDS)举办了关于脊柱推拿疗法研究现状的研讨会之后,研究一直是整脊疗法发展中一个难以捉摸却又至关重要的部分。过去,整脊疗法教育强调基础科学以获得合法性。为了增强竞争力,整脊治疗师常常求助于医学研究,而非开展自身的研究。该行业内一些极具天赋的个人和机构开发了新的范式、改进了治疗方法并掌握了临床技能。但几乎没有提供描述性信息来评估这些个人或他们的成就。由于超过半数的从业者执业年限不足10年,因此有必要重新审视整脊疗法研究这一特定领域曾经的情况。选择弗雷德·伊利的案例来说明任何敢于尝试且思路连贯从而获得成功的人所面临的内在困难。