• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[兴奋性氨基酸在神经病理学中的作用]

[Role of excitatory amino acids in neuropathology].

作者信息

Wikinski S I, Acosta G B

机构信息

Instituto de Investigaciones Farmacológicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Medicina (B Aires). 1995;55(4):355-65.

PMID:8728878
Abstract

Excitatory amino acids (EAA) became known as neurotransmitters of the central nervous system (CNS) in the last decade. The most studied EAA are glutamate and aspartate. Both are synthetized by the same mechanism as gamaaminobutyric acid. (Fig. 1). Glutamate is widely distributed in the CNS and the spinal cord, being the areas of higher concentration the cerebral cortex, the hypocampus and the cerebellum. There have been identified two type of receptors for glutamate: ionotropic and metabotropic. The former includes three different types: NMDA, AMPA and KA. NMDA receptor is coupled to a Na+ and Ca2+ channel being the second ion the most important one. This receptor has several sites of binding for various substances. Along with the site for N-methyl-D-aspartate, which binds glutamate and/or aspartate, there have been identified a site for the binding of glycine (which is different from the strychnine sensitive one), a site for poliamines such as spermine and spermidine, and a site for the binding of Zn2+ (Table 1). AMPA receptor is associated to a Ca(2+)-Na+ channel, being in this case the Na+ the most important ion. There are two metabotropic type receptors: L-AP4 and trans-ACPD. Both are coupled to a G protein and agonists exert their action increasing phospholipase C activity which in turn induces an increment of IP3 and diacyl-glicerol, and a consecutive releasing of Ca2+ from intracellular stores. EAA play a role in some physiological processes. One of them is long-term potentiation (LTP), an electrochemical phenomenon involved in memory consolidation. Antagonists of NMDA and AMPA receptor prevent the development of LTP, and conversely, the agonist of glycine site of NMDA receptor--D-cycloserine--facilitates memory consolidation. Since 1957, EAA are considered neurotoxic substances and there are many indirect evidences to support this statement. Pathogenesis of neuronal damage elicited by EAA involves the events shown in Fig. 3. Prevention of the cascade of events that provokes neurotoxicity may be achieved by NMDA antagonists, but once it has begun it may be only aborted subtracting the Ca2+ from the medium, using nifedipine or blocking AMPA receptor with an antagonist (CNQX). EAA have been shown to play a toxic role in neuronal damage induced by ischemia. Research using various experimental models demonstrated that NMDA receptor antagonists (i.e. MK 801) blocks postischemic damage. Interventions at various levels of the pathogenic cascade shown in Fig. 4 provoke the same results. There is enough evidence to suspect that NMDA and AMPA receptors are altered in epilepsy. NMDA antagonists (i.e. MK801 or AP5) prevent the development of epileptic seizures induced by kindling; CNQX, an AMPA antagonist, blocks the increase in electrical activity induced by K+ in slices of hypocampus; felbamate, an antiepileptic drug, blocks the glycine site (not strychnine sensitive) decreasing NMDA receptor activity. Several neurodegenerative disorders have been associated with exogenous administration or accidental intake of EAA. (i.e. neurolatirism, Guam disease). Similarities between these diseases and lateral aminotrophic sclerosis indicate that in the latter EAA may play a pathogenic role. Finally, the psychotomimetic effect of phencyclidine (an antagonist of NMDA receptor) suggests that in schizophrenia, together with dopaminergic neurotransmission impairment, some dysfunction of glutamate pathways may be present.

摘要

兴奋性氨基酸(EAA)在过去十年中成为中枢神经系统(CNS)的神经递质。研究最多的EAA是谷氨酸和天冬氨酸。两者都通过与γ-氨基丁酸相同的机制合成(图1)。谷氨酸广泛分布于中枢神经系统和脊髓中,浓度较高的区域是大脑皮层、海马体和小脑。已确定谷氨酸有两种类型的受体:离子型和代谢型。前者包括三种不同类型:N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体(NMDA)、α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸受体(AMPA)和海人藻酸受体(KA)。NMDA受体与一个钠离子和钙离子通道偶联,钙离子是第二种最重要的离子。该受体有多个与各种物质结合的位点。除了与谷氨酸和/或天冬氨酸结合的N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸位点外,还确定了一个甘氨酸结合位点(与士的宁敏感位点不同)、一个多胺如精胺和亚精胺的结合位点以及一个锌离子结合位点(表1)。AMPA受体与一个钙离子-钠离子通道相关联,在这种情况下钠离子是最重要的离子。有两种代谢型受体:L-2-氨基-4-膦酸丁酸(L-AP4)和反式-1-氨基环丙烷-1,3-二羧酸(trans-ACPD)。两者都与G蛋白偶联,激动剂通过增加磷脂酶C的活性发挥作用,这反过来又诱导三磷酸肌醇(IP3)和二酰甘油的增加,并随后从细胞内储存中释放钙离子。EAA在一些生理过程中起作用。其中之一是长时程增强(LTP),这是一种参与记忆巩固的电化学现象。NMDA和AMPA受体拮抗剂可阻止LTP的发展,相反,NMDA受体甘氨酸位点的激动剂——D-环丝氨酸——促进记忆巩固。自1957年以来,EAA被认为是神经毒性物质,有许多间接证据支持这一说法。EAA引起的神经元损伤的发病机制涉及图3所示的事件。使用NMDA拮抗剂可预防引发神经毒性的一系列事件,但一旦开始,可能只能通过使用硝苯地平从培养基中去除钙离子或用拮抗剂(CNQX)阻断AMPA受体来中止。EAA已被证明在缺血诱导的神经元损伤中起毒性作用。使用各种实验模型的研究表明,NMDA受体拮抗剂(即MK 801)可阻断缺血后损伤。对图4所示致病级联反应不同水平的干预会产生相同的结果。有足够的证据怀疑NMDA和AMPA受体在癫痫中发生改变。NMDA拮抗剂(即MK801或AP5)可预防点燃诱导的癫痫发作的发展;AMPA拮抗剂CNQX可阻断海马体切片中钾离子诱导的电活动增加;抗癫痫药物非氨酯可阻断甘氨酸位点(非士的宁敏感),降低NMDA受体活性。几种神经退行性疾病与外源性给予或意外摄入EAA有关(即神经病性梅毒、关岛病)。这些疾病与肌萎缩侧索硬化症之间的相似性表明,在后者中EAA可能起致病作用。最后,苯环己哌啶(一种NMDA受体拮抗剂)的拟精神病效应表明,在精神分裂症中,除了多巴胺能神经传递受损外,谷氨酸途径可能也存在一些功能障碍。

相似文献

1
[Role of excitatory amino acids in neuropathology].[兴奋性氨基酸在神经病理学中的作用]
Medicina (B Aires). 1995;55(4):355-65.
2
Excitatory amino acids: function and significance in reproduction and neuroendocrine regulation.兴奋性氨基酸:在生殖和神经内分泌调节中的功能及意义
Front Neuroendocrinol. 1994 Mar;15(1):3-49. doi: 10.1006/frne.1994.1002.
3
[The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor complex. Various sites of regulation and clinical consequences].[N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体复合物。调节的不同位点及临床后果]
Arzneimittelforschung. 1990 May;40(5):511-4.
4
Differential effects of NMDA and AMPA/kainate receptor antagonists on nitric oxide production in rat brain following intrahippocampal injection.海马内注射后,NMDA和AMPA/海人酸受体拮抗剂对大鼠脑内一氧化氮生成的不同影响。
Brain Res Bull. 2005 Sep 30;67(1-2):133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.06.019.
5
Cobalt accumulation in neurons expressing ionotropic excitatory amino acid receptors in young rat spinal cord: morphology and distribution.钴在幼鼠脊髓中表达离子型兴奋性氨基酸受体的神经元中的蓄积:形态学与分布
J Comp Neurol. 1994 Jun 15;344(3):321-35. doi: 10.1002/cne.903440302.
6
[Excitatory amino-acids, a new class of neurotransmitters. Pharmacology and functional properties].[兴奋性氨基酸,一类新型神经递质。药理学与功能特性]
Encephale. 1992 May-Jun;18(3):271-9.
7
LU 73068, a new non-NMDA and glycine/NMDA receptor antagonist: pharmacological characterization and comparison with NBQX and L-701,324 in the kindling model of epilepsy.LU 73068,一种新型非NMDA和甘氨酸/NMDA受体拮抗剂:在癫痫点燃模型中的药理学特性及与NBQX和L-701,324的比较
Br J Pharmacol. 1998 Nov;125(6):1258-66. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702172.
8
Characterization of neuroprotection from excitotoxicity by moderate and profound hypothermia in cultured cortical neurons unmasks a temperature-insensitive component of glutamate neurotoxicity.在培养的皮层神经元中,通过中度和深度低温对兴奋性毒性所致神经保护作用的特征分析揭示了谷氨酸神经毒性中一个对温度不敏感的成分。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998 Aug;18(8):848-67. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199808000-00005.
9
L-2-chloropropionic acid inhibits glutamate and aspartate release from rat cerebellar slices but does not activate cerebellar NMDA receptors: implications for L-2-chloropropionic acid-induced neurotoxicity.L-2-氯丙酸抑制大鼠小脑切片中谷氨酸和天冬氨酸的释放,但不激活小脑NMDA受体:对L-2-氯丙酸诱导的神经毒性的影响。
Neurotoxicology. 1997;18(1):169-77.
10
L-687,414, a low efficacy NMDA receptor glycine site partial agonist in vitro, does not prevent hippocampal LTP in vivo at plasma levels known to be neuroprotective.L-687,414,一种在体外为低效N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体甘氨酸位点部分激动剂的物质,在已知具有神经保护作用的血浆水平下,不能在体内阻止海马体的长时程增强效应。
Br J Pharmacol. 1998 Aug;124(8):1767-73. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702010.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of microbial dysbiosis discern potential metabolic link in neurodegenerative diseases.微生物群落失调的比较分析揭示了神经退行性疾病中潜在的代谢联系。
Front Neurosci. 2023 Apr 11;17:1153422. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1153422. eCollection 2023.
2
Effect of gamma-decanolactone on glutamate binding in the rat cerebral cortex.γ-癸内酯对大鼠大脑皮层中谷氨酸结合的影响。
Neurochem Res. 1997 Dec;22(12):1507-10. doi: 10.1023/a:1021962714034.