• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

审核眼科审计。

Auditing ophthalmology audits.

作者信息

Tabandeh H, Thompson G M

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, St George's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 1995;9 ( Pt 6 Su):1-5.

PMID:8729011
Abstract

Medical audit is now a well-established part of the routine of ophthalmology departments. Accomplishing a complete audit is a complex task and its effectiveness depends on how it is performed. In order to evaluate the procedure in our department a retrospective analysis of 18 audits was carried out with particular reference to the level, objectives, beneficial effects, and effects on current practice. Our practice was critically analysed using these factors. One audit fulfilled the criteria for a full audit. Eleven (60%) were partial or potential and six (30%) were an attempt in planning an audit. The majority omitted plans for implementing change or targets for future assessment. Seven had educational benefit. There was little effect on patient care, cost-effectiveness or communication. Medical audit can be clinically effective, educational and stimulating. Failure to complete all stages affects the outcome. This study identifies the difficulties involved in performing complete audits and suggests improving the procedure by auditing audits on a regular basis.

摘要

医学审计如今已成为眼科部门日常工作中既定的一部分。完成一次全面审计是一项复杂的任务,其有效性取决于执行方式。为了评估我们科室的审计程序,对18次审计进行了回顾性分析,特别关注审计水平、目标、有益效果以及对当前实践的影响。我们依据这些因素对自身实践进行了批判性分析。一次审计符合全面审计的标准。十一次(60%)是部分或潜在的审计,六次(30%)是审计规划方面的尝试。大多数审计遗漏了实施变革的计划或未来评估的目标。七次审计具有教育意义。对患者护理、成本效益或沟通几乎没有影响。医学审计在临床上可以是有效的、具有教育意义且能激发积极性的。未能完成所有阶段会影响结果。本研究明确了进行全面审计所涉及的困难,并建议通过定期对审计进行审核来改进审计程序。

相似文献

1
Auditing ophthalmology audits.审核眼科审计。
Eye (Lond). 1995;9 ( Pt 6 Su):1-5.
2
The assessment of criterion audit cycles by external peer review - when is an audit not an audit?通过外部同行评审评估标准审核周期——何时一次审核不再是审核?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Jun;13(3):352-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00704.x.
3
Internal quality audit and quality standards as a method of quality improvement at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital.大学医院眼科部将内部质量审核和质量标准作为质量改进的一种方法。
Coll Antropol. 2005;29 Suppl 1:21-4.
4
Effect of clinical audits of radiation use in one hospital district in Finland.芬兰某医院区辐射使用情况临床审计的效果
Acta Radiol. 2009 May;50(4):389-95. doi: 10.1080/02841850902755260.
5
Medical audit cycle. A review of methods and research in clinical practice.
Med Educ. 1982 Jul;16(4):228-38.
6
[The Spur inspection at the department of ophthalmology in Växjö is a stimulation to work].
Lakartidningen. 1995 Sep 13;92(37):3286, 3291-4, 3299.
7
Quality assurance: an approach.
Physiother Can. 1979 Jan-Feb;31(1):11-4.
8
An audit of paediatric audits.儿科审计的一次审计。
Arch Dis Child. 2004 Dec;89(12):1128-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.032565.
9
Audit of the Medical Audit Committee.医学审计委员会的审计
CMAJ. 1986 Aug 1;135(3):205-8.
10
Inpatient audit simplified.
Hospitals. 1978 Oct 1;52(19):75-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of Technology to Aid Clinical Audit in an Asian Emergency Medical Services Department.利用技术辅助亚洲某紧急医疗服务部门的临床审计。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 22;9(5):491. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050491.
2
Audit of orthopaedic audits in an english teaching hospital: are we closing the loop?对一家英语教学医院骨科审计的审核:我们是否形成了闭环?
Open Orthop J. 2010 Jun 11;4:188-92. doi: 10.2174/1874325001004010188.
3
Auditing orthopaedic audit.骨科审计的审核
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Nov;90(8):675-8. doi: 10.1308/003588408X318147. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
4
An audit of audits: are we completing the cycle?对审计工作的审计:我们是否完成了这个循环?
J R Soc Med. 2001 Jun;94(6):288-9. doi: 10.1177/014107680109400609.
5
Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit.回顾性审核:有效临床审核的障碍与促进因素
Qual Health Care. 2000 Mar;9(1):23-36. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.1.23.