Bolliger C T, Jordan P, Solèr M, Stulz P, Tamm M, Wyser C, Gonon M, Perruchoud A P
Dept of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Eur Respir J. 1996 Mar;9(3):415-21. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09030415.
The influence of pulmonary resection on functional capacity can be assessed in different ways. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of lobectomy and pneumonectomy on pulmonary function tests (PFT), exercise capacity and perception of symptoms. Sixty eight patients underwent functional assessment with PFT and exercise testing before (Preop), and 3 and 6 months after lung resection. In 50 (36 males and 14 females; mean age 61 yrs) a lobectomy was performed and in 18 (13 males and 5 females; mean age 59 yrs) a pneumonectomy was performed. Three months after lobectomy, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), total lung capacity (TLC), transfer factor of the lungs for carbon monoxide (TL,CO) and maximal oxygen uptake (V'O2,max) were significantly lower than Preop values, increasing significantly from 3 to 6 months after resection. Three months after pneumonectomy, all parameters were significantly lower than Preop values and significantly lower than postlobectomy values and did not recover from 3 to 6 months after resection. At 6 months after resection significant deficits persisted in comparison with Preop: for FVC 7% and 36%, FEV1 9% and 34%, TLC 10% and 33% for lobectomy and pneumonectomy, respectively; and V'O2,max 20% after pneumonectomy only. Exercise was limited by leg muscle fatigue in 53% of all patients at Preop. This was not altered by lobectomy, but there was a switch to dyspnoea as the limiting factor after pneumonectomy (61% of patients at 3 months and 50% at 6 months after resection). Furthermore, pneumonectomy compared to lobectomy led to a significantly smaller breathing reserve (mean +/- SD) (28 +/- 13 vs 37 +/- 16% at 3 months; and 24 +/- 11% vs 33 +/- 12% at 6 months post resection) and lower arterial oxygen tension at peak exercise 10.1 +/- 1.5 vs 11.5 +/- 1.6 kPa (76 +/- 11 vs 86 +/- 12 mmHg) at 3 months; 10.1 +/- 1.3 vs 11.3 +/- 1.6 kPa (76 +/- 10 vs 85 +/- 12 mmHg) at 6 months postresection. We conclude that measurements of conventional pulmonary function tests alone overestimate the decrease in functional capacity after lung resection. Exercise capacity after lobectomy is unchanged, whereas pneumonectomy leads to a 20% decrease, probably due to the reduced area of gas exchange.
肺切除对功能能力的影响可以通过不同方式进行评估。本研究的目的是比较肺叶切除术和全肺切除术对肺功能测试(PFT)、运动能力和症状感知的影响。68例患者在肺切除术前(Preop)、术后3个月和6个月接受了PFT和运动测试的功能评估。其中50例(36例男性和14例女性;平均年龄61岁)接受了肺叶切除术,18例(13例男性和5例女性;平均年龄59岁)接受了全肺切除术。肺叶切除术后3个月,用力肺活量(FVC)、一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、肺总量(TLC)、肺一氧化碳弥散量(TL,CO)和最大摄氧量(V'O2,max)显著低于术前值,术后3至6个月显著增加。全肺切除术后3个月,所有参数均显著低于术前值,且显著低于肺叶切除术后的值,术后3至6个月未恢复。术后6个月,与术前相比仍存在显著缺陷:肺叶切除术和全肺切除术的FVC分别降低7%和36%,FEV1分别降低9%和34%,TLC分别降低10%和33%;仅全肺切除术后V'O2,max降低20%。术前53%的患者运动受腿部肌肉疲劳限制。肺叶切除术对此无改变,但全肺切除术后转变为呼吸困难成为限制因素(术后3个月61%的患者,术后6个月50%的患者)。此外,与肺叶切除术相比,全肺切除术导致呼吸储备显著减小(均值±标准差)(术后3个月为28±13%对37±16%;术后6个月为24±11%对33±12%),运动高峰时动脉血氧张力降低(术后3个月为10.1±1.5对11.5±1.6 kPa[76±11对86±12 mmHg];术后6个月为10.1±1.3对11.3±1.6 kPa[76±10对85±12 mmHg])。我们得出结论,仅通过传统肺功能测试测量高估了肺切除术后功能能力的下降。肺叶切除术后运动能力未改变,而全肺切除术导致20%的下降,可能是由于气体交换面积减少。