Buus S, Zhang L, Florentine M
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (409 DA), Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Apr;99(4 Pt 1):2288-97. doi: 10.1121/1.415416.
This study tests the hypothesis that comodulation masking release (CMR) is mediated by "listening in the valleys" [S. Buus, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 1958-1965 (1985)]. Detectability was measured for signals consisting of six consecutive 25-ms, 1-kHz tone pulses presented in a 50-Hz-wide masker or in maskers consisting of seven 50-Hz-wide noises, one critical band apart, with either correlated or uncorrelated envelopes. The level of each signal pulse varied randomly around masked threshold according to Gaussian distributions with rms perturbations (standard deviations) of 3 or 6 dB. For each listener and condition, the responses from 5000 trials were sorted to construct conditional psychometric functions for d' as a function of signal-pulse intensity for ten ranges of short-term level of the on-frequency masker band during the pulse. The slopes of these functions for three normal listeners decrease markedly with increasing short-term masker level for the correlated multiband masker, but are largely constant for the other maskers. This indicates that the weight applied to the signal channel is high when the masker level is low and vice versa for the correlated masker, but is approximately constant for single-band and uncorrelated multiband maskers. These findings provide direct evidence that CMR is mediated by "listening in the valleys," but models based on direct envelope comparison may also account for the results if they are modified to include a compressive nonlinearity before the comparison.
共调制掩蔽释放(CMR)是由“谷底聆听”介导的 [S. 布斯,《美国声学学会杂志》78, 1958 - 1965 (1985)]。对由六个连续的25毫秒、1千赫纯音脉冲组成的信号进行可探测性测量,这些信号呈现于一个50赫兹带宽的掩蔽器中,或者呈现于由七个50赫兹带宽的噪声组成的掩蔽器中,这些噪声相隔一个临界频带,其包络要么相关要么不相关。每个信号脉冲的电平根据均方根扰动(标准差)为3或6分贝的高斯分布在掩蔽阈值附近随机变化。对于每个聆听者和条件,对5000次试验的响应进行排序,以构建d' 的条件心理测量函数,该函数表示在脉冲期间,信号脉冲强度与同频掩蔽器频段短期电平的十个范围之间的函数关系。对于三个正常聆听者,对于相关多频段掩蔽器,这些函数的斜率随着短期掩蔽器电平的增加而显著下降,但对于其他掩蔽器,斜率基本保持不变。这表明,对于相关掩蔽器,当掩蔽器电平较低时,施加于信号通道的权重较高,反之亦然,但对于单频段和不相关多频段掩蔽器,该权重大致保持恒定。这些发现提供了直接证据,证明CMR是由“谷底聆听”介导的,但基于直接包络比较的模型,如果在比较之前进行修改以纳入压缩非线性,也可能解释这些结果。