Davis P W
Department of Sociology, Georgia State University, Atlanta 30303, USA.
Child Abuse Negl. 1996 Apr;20(4):289-304. doi: 10.1016/0145-2134(96)00010-5.
This study examined firsthand observations of adults (N = 70) making public verbal threats to physically punish or hurt children. While many adults threatened the child with a "spanking," most used a variety of other terms, some euphemistic and some menacing, to label the threatened event. Angry shouting seemed rare, and swearing was almost nonexistent. Many threatening adults, however, also hit the child. In the course of threatening their children, adults typically attributed unshared responsibility for group problems to the child. They also normalized their own aggression by acting as though nothing unusual had happened. Perhaps for tactical reasons, most children also reacted as though there were nothing unusual about the threat. No one inside or outside the group intervened. It is argued that a complete understanding of verbal aggression against children requires an appreciation of the ongoing interaction in which episodes are embedded, and of the immediate social context in which episodes develop. Public places may be an important facilitative context because of the expectations associated with a parent's public persona.
本研究考察了70名成年人对儿童进行公开口头威胁,称要对其进行体罚或伤害的第一手观察资料。虽然许多成年人用“打屁股”来威胁孩子,但大多数人使用了各种其他措辞,有些是委婉的,有些是威胁性的,来描述这种威胁行为。愤怒的叫嚷似乎很少见,咒骂几乎不存在。然而,许多进行威胁的成年人也会打孩子。在威胁孩子的过程中,成年人通常将群体问题中自己应承担的责任归咎于孩子。他们还表现得好像没发生什么异常似的,以此来使自己的攻击行为正常化。或许出于策略性原因,大多数孩子的反应也好像这种威胁没什么异常。群体内外都没有人进行干预。有人认为,要全面理解针对儿童的言语攻击,就需要了解这些事件所嵌入的持续互动,以及这些事件发生的直接社会背景。公共场所可能是一个重要的促成背景,因为它与父母的公众形象相关的期望。