Carvalho M L, Silver L D
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública da Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Rev Saude Publica. 1995 Oct;29(5):342-8. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89101995000500002.
The main causes of neonatal mortality, the reliability of the underlying cause of death registered in the death certificate, and the impact of problems of reliability on the analysis of preventable death were studied. The information on death certificates from a 15% sample of neonatal deaths between May 1986 and April 1987 in the Greater Metropolitan Region of Rio de Janeiro was compared to the information in the hospital records of the 452 deceased infants. A "modified underlying cause" considered most correct according to disease classification rules was identified from the records. The great majority of deaths (87%) were due to perinatal causes. Agreement between the originally declared and modified underlying causes of death was poor: 38% for 3 digits of the International Classification of Diseases Codes (CID-9) and 33% for 4 digits. The modified underlying causes are more weighted towards maternal conditions and complications, which increased by a factor of 12.8, and towards complications of the placenta, umbilical cord, labour and delivery, which rose by a factor of 6.2 in relation to the original causes. The utilization of the "modified" underlying cause elevated considerably (58%) the proportion of deaths considered reducible by the classification of neonatal death proposed by the SEADE Foundation. Seventy-five percent (75%) of deaths were considered reducible or partially reducible. One hundred and seven (24%) of the deaths of them being in infants of normal birthweight, of which 60% considered preventable. Four (4) deaths from congenital syphilis, 3 from perinatal hemolytic diseases, and 21 unattended home deaths of infants were also identified. In summary, important problems were identified in the reliability of the declaration of the underlying causes of neonatal death, whose correction tends to elevate the proportion considered reducible or preventable. The potential for the use of death certificate data for the monitoring of quality is evident, nonetheless improvements are needed in the quality of these data.
研究了新生儿死亡的主要原因、死亡证明上登记的根本死因的可靠性以及可靠性问题对可预防死亡分析的影响。将1986年5月至1987年4月里约热内卢大都市区15%的新生儿死亡样本的死亡证明信息与452名死亡婴儿的医院记录信息进行了比较。根据疾病分类规则,从记录中确定了被认为最正确的“修正根本死因”。绝大多数死亡(87%)是由围产期原因导致的。最初申报的根本死因与修正后的根本死因之间的一致性较差:国际疾病分类代码(CID - 9)3位数的一致性为38%,4位数的一致性为33%。修正后的根本死因更倾向于母亲状况和并发症,其比例相对于原始原因增加了12.8倍,胎盘、脐带、分娩和产程并发症的比例增加了6.2倍。使用“修正后的”根本死因显著提高了(58%)根据SEADE基金会提出的新生儿死亡分类被认为可减少的死亡比例。75%的死亡被认为是可减少的或部分可减少的。其中107例(24%)死亡发生在出生体重正常的婴儿中,其中60%被认为是可预防的。还确定了4例先天性梅毒死亡、3例围产期溶血性疾病死亡以及21例婴儿在家无人照料死亡。总之,在新生儿死亡根本死因申报的可靠性方面发现了重要问题,对其进行修正往往会提高被认为可减少或可预防的比例。尽管如此,利用死亡证明数据进行质量监测的潜力是明显的,这些数据的质量仍需改进。