Sutton R
Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1996 Feb;89 Spec No 1:25-28.
Many studies have claimed successful pharmacological prevention of vasovagal syncope in open formats with a wide variety of drugs. However, when therapy has been subjected to clinical trial to date no drug has shown any real benefit but it is necessary to add that the means of assessment leave much to be desired. These are repeat tilt testing, reported symptoms, analysis of syncopal burden in a population and time to syncopal recurrence. The disadvantages of any parameter derived from tilt testing is that its reproducibility is open to question and other aspects such as tilt duration before syncope have been inadequately investigated. With respect to symptom recurrence there are limitations because of the well known occurrence of vasovagal syncope in clusters and the long trial time that it is necessary because of relatively infrequent attacks. Furthermore, there is a placebo effect of the investigation of syncope which may delay the first recurrence. The first large trial is now underway and it is hoped that it may offer a method of prevention of vasovagal syncope which is both effective and acceptable.
许多研究声称在开放试验中使用多种药物成功实现了对血管迷走性晕厥的药物预防。然而,迄今为止,当对治疗方法进行临床试验时,没有一种药物显示出任何实际益处,但必须补充的是,评估手段仍有很大的改进空间。这些评估手段包括重复倾斜试验、报告的症状、对人群中晕厥负担的分析以及晕厥复发时间。任何从倾斜试验得出的参数的缺点在于其可重复性存疑,而且诸如晕厥前倾斜持续时间等其他方面尚未得到充分研究。关于症状复发,由于血管迷走性晕厥众所周知的成簇发作情况以及因发作相对不频繁而需要较长的试验时间,存在一定局限性。此外,晕厥调查存在安慰剂效应,这可能会延迟首次复发。目前首个大型试验正在进行,希望它能提供一种有效且可接受的预防血管迷走性晕厥的方法。