• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头影测量形态的傅里叶分析。

Fourier analysis of cephalometric shapes.

作者信息

Ferrario V F, Sforza C, Poggio C E, D'Addona A, Taroni A

机构信息

Istituto di Anatomia Umana Normale, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996 May;33(3):206-12. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1996_033_0206_faocs_2.3.co_2.

DOI:10.1597/1545-1569_1996_033_0206_faocs_2.3.co_2
PMID:8734720
Abstract

Craniofacial growth and development involve both size and shape variations. Shape variations can be assessed independently from size using mathematical methods such as the Fourier series. A method for the reconstruction of outlines starting from selected landmarks and for their Fourier analysis has been developed and applied to analyze the age differences in shape in the tracings of the Bolton standards (lateral view) from 1 to 18 years of age. The size-independent shape of the Bolton standard at 18 years was larger at the chin, at the gonion, and in the anterior cranial base than the shape at 1 year of age. Conversely, the younger shape was larger in the middle part of face, corresponding roughly to the maxillary bone, than the older shape. When standardized for size, growth thus seemed to modify craniofacial shape with progressive lengthening and narrowing. This shape effect was largely overwhelmed by the very evident size increments, and it could be measured only using the proper mathematical methods.

摘要

颅面生长发育涉及大小和形状的变化。形状变化可以使用傅里叶级数等数学方法独立于大小进行评估。已经开发出一种从选定地标重建轮廓并对其进行傅里叶分析的方法,并将其应用于分析博尔顿标准(侧视图)1至18岁年龄段追踪图中的形状年龄差异。18岁时博尔顿标准的与大小无关的形状在下巴、下颌角和前颅底比1岁时的形状更大。相反,较年轻的形状在面部中部(大致对应上颌骨)比年长的形状更大。当按大小标准化时,生长似乎通过逐渐延长和变窄来改变颅面形状。这种形状效应在很大程度上被非常明显的大小增加所掩盖,并且只能使用适当的数学方法来测量。

相似文献

1
Fourier analysis of cephalometric shapes.头影测量形态的傅里叶分析。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996 May;33(3):206-12. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1996_033_0206_faocs_2.3.co_2.
2
Elliptic Fourier analysis of mandibular shape.下颌骨形状的椭圆傅里叶分析
J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1996 Oct-Dec;16(4):208-17.
3
Effect of growth and development on cephalometric shapes in orthodontic patients: a Fourier analysis.生长发育对正畸患者头颅测量形态的影响:傅里叶分析
Eur J Orthod. 1997 Dec;19(6):669-80. doi: 10.1093/ejo/19.6.669.
4
Effect of growth and development on human soft tissue facial shape: a Fourier analysis.生长发育对人类面部软组织形态的影响:傅里叶分析
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1996;11(2):155-63.
5
Elliptic Fourier analysis of facial profiles during growth and development.生长发育过程中面部轮廓的椭圆傅里叶分析
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 2002;17(4):348-54.
6
A size-standardized analysis of soft tissue facial profile during growth.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Jul;112(1):28-33. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70270-1.
7
Three-dimensional Bolton-Brush Growth Study landmark data: ontogeny and sexual dimorphism of the Bolton standards cohort.三维博尔顿-布拉什生长研究标志点数据:博尔顿标准队列的个体发育与性别差异
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000 Mar;37(2):145-56. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_2000_037_0145_tdbbgs_2.3.co_2.
8
Visualization of individual growth-related craniofacial changes based on cephalometric landmark data: a pilot study.基于头影测量标志点数据的个体生长相关颅面变化可视化:一项初步研究。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002 May;39(3):341-52. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_2002_039_0341_voigrc_2.0.co_2.
9
The spheno-occipital synchondrosis: the missing link between the profession's concept of craniofacial growth and orthodontic treatment.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Dec;114(6):709-12; discussion 713-4. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70204-5.
10
Comparison of the Bolton Standards to longitudinal cephalograms superimposed on the occipital condyle (I-point).将博尔顿标准与叠加在枕髁(I点)上的头颅侧位片进行比较。
J Orthod. 2009 Mar;36(1):23-35; discussion 13-4. doi: 10.1179/14653120722896.