Petrac D, Radić B, Birtić K, Gjurović J
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 May;19(5):784-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03360.x.
The value of nonfunctional infrahisal second-degree atrioventricular (AV) block induced by incremental atrial pacing was prospectively examined in 192 patients with chronic bundle branch block (BBB) and syncope. We compared 174 (91%) patients with normal response to atrial pacing (Group I) to 18 (9%) patients with atrial pacing induced nonfunctional infrashisal second-degree AV block (Group II). Patients in group I had higher incidence of organic heart disease, ventricular tachycardia induction, and retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction (P < 0.001, P < 0.05, P < 0.01, respectively), while patients in group II had higher incidence of primary conduction disease and prolonged H-V intervals (P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001). During mean follow-up period of 65 +/- 34 months for group I, and 68 +/- 35 months for group II, a development of spontaneous second- or third-degree AV block was higher in group II (14/18 [78%]), than in group I (15/174 [9%]) (P < 0.001). The site of AV block was infrahisal in all patients in group II, and in 10 of 15 patients in group I. Because of the prophylactic pacing in all patients in group II, the incidence of sudden death was similar among the two groups, but patients in group I had higher incidence of cardiac death (P < 0.05).
In patients with chronic BBB and syncope, a nonfunctional infrashisal AV block induced by incremental atrial pacing identified patients with particularly high risk of development of spontaneous infrahisal AV block. Therefore, permanent cardiac pacing is absolutely indicated in these patients.
前瞻性研究了192例慢性束支传导阻滞(BBB)和晕厥患者在递增心房起搏时诱发的无功能性希氏束下二度房室(AV)阻滞的价值。我们将174例(91%)对心房起搏反应正常的患者(I组)与18例(9%)心房起搏诱发无功能性希氏束下二度AV阻滞的患者(II组)进行了比较。I组患者器质性心脏病、室性心动过速诱发和室房逆行传导的发生率较高(分别为P < 0.001、P < 0.05、P < 0.01),而II组患者原发性传导疾病和H-V间期延长的发生率较高(P < 0.001、P < 0.01、P < 0.001)。I组平均随访65±34个月,II组平均随访68±35个月,II组自发发生二度或三度AV阻滞的发生率(14/18 [78%])高于I组(15/174 [9%])(P < 0.001)。II组所有患者的AV阻滞部位均在希氏束下,I组15例患者中有10例如此。由于II组所有患者均进行了预防性起搏,两组的猝死发生率相似,但I组患者的心源性死亡发生率较高(P < 0.05)。
在慢性BBB和晕厥患者中,递增心房起搏诱发的无功能性希氏束下AV阻滞可识别出自发性希氏束下AV阻滞发生风险特别高的患者。因此,这些患者绝对需要永久性心脏起搏。