Shimizu H
Kobe Gakuin University, Faculty of Humanities and Sciences, Japan.
Memory. 1996 May;4(3):265-87. doi: 10.1080/096582196388951.
Three experiments were carried out to determine (a) the effectiveness of associative rehearsal and rote repetition for long-term recall with and without expectation of a later recall test, and (b) the subjects' ability to assess their own future recall performance. The overall results showed that a test expectancy effect was not obtained when a voluntary selection in strategies was prohibited, but was found for subjects not instructed in the use of any particular strategy. It is also shown that the subjects could predict correctly that the items studied with associative rehearsal would be recalled more successfully at the final test than when they were studied with rote repetition. A superiority of associative rehearsal for prediction was not found when the subjects used only one type of rehearsal, but was found when they were not given the immediate test. The results suggest that the expectancy effect can be explained in terms of subjects' intentional shifts of strategies based on their metacognitive assessment of such strategies.
进行了三项实验,以确定:(a) 有无后续回忆测试预期时,联想复述和机械重复对长期回忆的有效性;(b) 受试者评估自身未来回忆表现的能力。总体结果表明,当禁止策略的自愿选择时,未获得测试预期效应,但在未接受任何特定策略使用指导的受试者中发现了该效应。研究还表明,受试者能够正确预测,在最终测试中,通过联想复述学习的项目比通过机械重复学习的项目能更成功地被回忆起来。当受试者仅使用一种复述方式时,未发现联想复述在预测方面的优势,但在未进行即时测试时发现了该优势。结果表明,预期效应可以根据受试者基于对这些策略的元认知评估而进行的策略有意转变来解释。