Regional haemodynamic effects of antagonists of angiotensin II, endothelin and adrenoceptors in conscious, vasopressin-deficient, genetically hypertensive rats.

1. Male, vasopressin-deficient, normotensive (DI/N) and hypertensive (DI/H) rats were chronically instrumented (all surgery under sodium methohexitone anaesthesia) to allow assessment of resting haemodynamic status and responses to antagonism of AT1-receptors (Experiment 1), ET(A-) and ET(B-) receptors (Experiment 2) or adrenoceptors (Experiment 3). 2. Before any treatment, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was higher, and hindquarters vascular conductance was consistently lower in all groups of DI/H rats than in DI/N rats. 3. In Experiment 1, losartan (10 mg kg-1 i.v.), an AT1-receptor antagonist, was given 5 h after s.c. injection of saline, (DI/N, n = 8; DI/H, n = 8) or hyperoncotic polyethylene glycol, (DI/N, n = 9; DI/H, n = 9) to induce isosmotic hypovolaemia. In the volume-replete state, losartan caused similar small falls in MAP in the two groups (maximum delta MAP; DI/N, -9 +/- 2; DI/H, -15 +/- 5 mmHg), but the mesenteric and hindquarters vasodilatations were greater in DI/N rats. In the volume-depleted state the effects of losartan were augmented (delta MAP; DI/N, -32 +/- 3; DI/H. -31 +/- 3 mmHg), but its vasodilator effects were still greater in DI/N than in DI/H rats. 4. In Experiment 2, infusion of the ET(A-)ET(B-)receptor antagonist, SB 209670 (600 micrograms kg-1 h-1; DI/N, n = 8; DI/H, n = 9), had haemodynamic effects that were not different from those during saline infusion in DI/N (n = 7) and DI/H rats (n = 8). 5. In Experiment 3, sequential administration of the beta 2-adrenoceptor antagonist, ICI 118551 (0.2 mg kg-1 bolus, 0.1 mg kg-1 h-1 infusion), the alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist, idazoxan (0.75 mg kg-1 bolus, 1 mg kg-1 h-1 infusion), and losartan (10 mg kg-1 bolus) had only slight haemodynamic effects in DI/N (n = 8) and DI/H (n = 9) rats. Subsequent administration of the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin (0.5 mg kg-1 bolus, 0.8 mg kg-1 h-1 infusion) caused marked hypotension, although MAP was still higher in DI/H (95 +/- 4 mmHg) than in DI/N (75 +/- 4 mmHg) rats. However, in this circumstance there were no significant differences between renal, or mesenteric, or hindquarters vascular conductances in the two groups. 6. The results indicate that the hypertension and hindquarters vasoconstriction in DI/H rats is not dependent on AII or endothelin. Moreover, the relative elevation in MAP in DI/H persists in the presence of antagonism of beta 2, alpha 2- and alpha 1-adrenoceptors, in spite of no significant difference in regional vascular conductances.