LaPorte D J
Department of Psychology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania 15705-1068, USA.
Appetite. 1996 Apr;26(2):119-27. doi: 10.1006/appe.1996.0010.
Traditional methods for examining binge-eating (e.g. food diaries, laboratory binges), primarily employing clinical samples, have a number of limitations. This paper details three studies utilizing a new methodology to examine perceptions of binge eating: standard videotapes of male and female models consuming doughnuts. College students (n = 459) viewed one of nine videotapes and were asked if the eating behavior of the model was a binge or not. Variables manipulated include gender of the model, number of doughnuts, rate of eating and social (vs. solitary) eating. The number of doughnuts eaten by a female model was sufficient for female subjects to label it as a binge. In order for a male to have binged, females responded to the amount; males required both speed and amount. Results are discussed in terms of their relevance for understanding perception of binge eating in normal and clinical populations.
传统的暴饮暴食检测方法（如饮食日记、实验室暴饮暴食测试）主要使用临床样本，存在诸多局限性。本文详细介绍了三项研究，这些研究采用一种新方法来检测对暴饮暴食的认知：男女模特食用甜甜圈的标准录像带。大学生（n = 459）观看了九盘录像带中的一盘，并被问及模特的进食行为是否属于暴饮暴食。所操控的变量包括模特的性别、甜甜圈的数量、进食速度以及社交性（相对于独自）进食情况。女性模特食用的甜甜圈数量足以让女性受试者将其标记为暴饮暴食。对于男性的暴饮暴食行为，女性关注的是进食量；而男性则既要求速度又要求量。文中依据这些结果与理解正常人群和临床人群对暴饮暴食认知的相关性进行了讨论。
