Suppr超能文献

互动式小组讨论:一项使用行为干预措施以减少公共卫生机构注射使用情况的对照试验结果

Interactional group discussion: results of a controlled trial using a behavioral intervention to reduce the use of injections in public health facilities.

作者信息

Hadiyono J E, Suryawati S, Danu S S, Santoso B

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, Gadjah Mada University, Bulak Sumur Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1996 Apr;42(8):1177-83. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00391-6.

Abstract

Injections are commonly overused in Indonesia. More than 60% of patients attending public health facilities receive at least one injection, which increases clinical risk and has adverse economic impact. This study assesses the efficacy of an innovative behavioral intervention, the Interactional Group Discussion (IGD), for reducing the overuse of injections. This study was a controlled trial in a single district with 24 public health centers randomized to intervention and control groups. Prescribers in the intervention group were invited to one IGD, each of which consisted of 6 prescribers and 6 patients; a total of 24 IGDs were held in a 4-week period, and all invited prescribers participated. The groups, which lasted 90-120 minutes, were facilitated by a behavioral scientist and a clinician, who also served as a scientific resource person. The hypothesized mechanism of behavior change involved reality testing prescribers' assumptions about patient beliefs, imparting scientific information about injection efficacy, and establishing peer norms about correct behavior. Outcomes were measured by a retrospective prescribing survey covering the periods 3 months before and 3 months after the intervention, with samples of 100 prescriptions per center per month. Rates of injection and average number of drugs per prescription were computed separately for each center, and t-tests were used to compare pre-post changes in outcomes in both groups. Results showed a significant decrease in injection use from 69.5 to 42.3% in the intervention group, compared to a decrease from 75.6 to 67.1% among controls [-18.7.0% intervention vs control, 95% CI = (-31.1%, -6.4%), P < 0.025]. There was also a significant reduction in average number of drugs per prescription [-0.37 drugs prescribed per patient, 95% CI = (-0.04, -0.52), P < 0.05], indicating that injections were not substituted with other drugs. We conclude that the IGD significantly reduces the overuse of injections. It is suggested to try out other behavioral interventions to improve the rational use of drugs.

摘要

在印度尼西亚,注射疗法普遍被过度使用。超过60%前往公共卫生机构就诊的患者至少接受过一次注射,这增加了临床风险并产生了不良经济影响。本研究评估了一种创新行为干预措施——互动小组讨论(IGD)减少注射疗法过度使用的效果。本研究是在一个单一地区进行的对照试验,将24个公共卫生中心随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组的开处方者被邀请参加一次IGD,每次IGD由6名开处方者和6名患者组成;在4周内共举办了24次IGD,所有受邀的开处方者均参与其中。每次时长90 - 120分钟的小组讨论由一名行为科学家和一名临床医生主持,该临床医生同时担任科学资源提供者。行为改变的假设机制包括对开处方者关于患者观念的假设进行现实检验、传授关于注射疗效的科学信息以及建立正确行为的同伴规范。通过一项回顾性处方调查来衡量结果,该调查涵盖干预前3个月和干预后3个月的时间段,每个中心每月抽取100份处方作为样本。分别计算每个中心的注射率和每张处方的平均用药数量,并使用t检验来比较两组干预前后结果的变化。结果显示,干预组的注射使用率从69.5%显著降至42.3%,而对照组从75.6%降至67.1%[-干预组与对照组变化为-18.7.0%,95%置信区间 = (-31.1%, -6.4%),P < 0.025]。每张处方的平均用药数量也显著减少[-每位患者开具的药物减少0.37种,95%置信区间 = (-0.04, -0.52),P < 0.05],这表明注射并未被其他药物替代。我们得出结论,IGD显著减少了注射疗法的过度使用。建议尝试其他行为干预措施以改善药物的合理使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验