Fine J B, Bartness T J
Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta 30303, USA.
Physiol Behav. 1996 Jun;59(6):1039-50. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02240-6.
Siberian hamsters exhibit a decrease in peak body mass/fat and caloric intake when they are exposed to short winter-like days (SDs) compared with hamsters exposed to long summer-like days (LDs). We hypothesize that the photoperiod may directly or indirectly mediate alterations in gustatory processing that may account for shifts in the preferences for specific food types and/or macronutrients. Two experiments lasting 14 days each were conducted to: 1) identify photoperiod-related differences in diet selection, and; 2) determine whether these differences were a primary effect of SD exposure or a secondary effect due to SD-induced decreases in body fat/mass. In Experiment 1, two groups of hamsters were exposed to either LDs or SDs and given access to three complex food types [sunflower seeds (SF); rabbit chow (RC); millet seeds (M)]. In addition to their photoperiod-induced decreased body and fat pad mass, and caloric intake, SD-housed hamsters exhibited significant differences in their patterns of diet selection and relative amounts of fat, carbohydrate (COH), and protein eaten compared with LD-housed hamsters. By the end of the experiment, SD-housed hamsters selected a diet higher in COH and protein and lower in fat than that selected by LD-housed hamsters. Because SD-housed hamsters decrease their body mass/fat, this may reflect an adaptive strategy to maintain a leaner body mass. A second experiment was conducted to test whether the diet selection pattern of SD-housed hamsters was due to the SD-induced decrease in body mass/fat. LD-housed hamsters were allowed to feed ad lib (AL group), or were food restricted (FR group) to simulate a SD-induced decrease in body mass. Both groups were then released into the diet self-selection paradigm. FR hamsters reversed their food restriction-induced decrease in body mass and showed concurrent alterations in diet self-selection patterns that were distinct from the SD-induced patterns seen in Experiment 1. Specifically, they showed a persistent hyperphagia and selected a larger proportion of their total calories as M (high COH) and less as SF (high fat) than did AL hamsters during their return to LD body mass levels. However, once LD body mass levels were achieved, they increased their SF intake, and thus fat consumption. Despite these dynamic daily changes, the average selection patterns of both the diet types and macronutrients were not different by the end of the experiment. Therefore, it appears that the SD-induced changes in the selection of food sources (and ultimately, the macronutrient composition of the diet) cannot be solely attributable to the SD-induced decreases in body mass.
与暴露在类似夏季长日照(LDs)环境下的仓鼠相比,西伯利亚仓鼠在暴露于类似冬季短日照(SDs)环境时,其体重/脂肪峰值和热量摄入会减少。我们推测,光周期可能直接或间接介导味觉处理的改变,这可能解释了对特定食物类型和/或宏量营养素偏好的变化。我们进行了两个各持续14天的实验,目的是:1)确定饮食选择中与光周期相关的差异;2)确定这些差异是SD暴露的主要影响,还是由于SD导致的体脂/体重下降的次要影响。在实验1中,两组仓鼠分别暴露于LDs或SDs环境,并提供三种复合食物类型[葵花籽(SF);兔粮(RC);小米种子(M)]。除了光周期导致的体重和脂肪垫质量下降以及热量摄入减少外,与LD环境饲养的仓鼠相比,SD环境饲养的仓鼠在饮食选择模式以及所摄入脂肪、碳水化合物(COH)和蛋白质的相对量方面表现出显著差异。到实验结束时,SD环境饲养的仓鼠选择的饮食中COH和蛋白质含量较高,脂肪含量较低,而LD环境饲养的仓鼠则相反。由于SD环境饲养的仓鼠体重/脂肪减少,这可能反映了一种维持更瘦体重的适应性策略。进行了第二个实验,以测试SD环境饲养的仓鼠的饮食选择模式是否是由于SD导致的体重/脂肪下降。让LD环境饲养的仓鼠自由采食(AL组),或进行食物限制(FR组)以模拟SD导致的体重下降。然后将两组仓鼠放入饮食自选模式中。FR组仓鼠扭转了食物限制导致的体重下降,并在饮食自选模式中出现了与实验1中SD诱导的模式不同的并发变化。具体而言,在恢复到LD体重水平期间,与AL组仓鼠相比,它们表现出持续的食欲亢进,并且在总热量中选择较大比例的M(高COH),而选择SF(高脂肪)的比例较小。然而,一旦达到LD体重水平,它们就会增加SF的摄入量,从而增加脂肪消耗。尽管存在这些每日动态变化,但到实验结束时,两种饮食类型和宏量营养素的平均选择模式并无差异。因此,似乎SD诱导的食物来源选择变化(最终是饮食中宏量营养素组成的变化)不能仅仅归因于SD诱导的体重下降。