Marini G, Murray S, Goldhirsch A, Gelber R D, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Price K N, Tattersall M H, Rudenstam C M, Collins J, Lindtner J, Cavalli F, Cortés-Funes H, Gudgeon A, Forbes J F, Galligioni E, Coates A S, Senn H J
International Breast Cancer Study Group, Ospedale Civico, Switzerland.
Ann Oncol. 1996 Mar;7(3):245-50. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010567.
The addition of low-dose prednisone (p) to the adjuvant regimen of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) allowed patients to receive a larger dose of cytotoxics when compared with those on CMF alone. However, disease-free survival and overall survival were similar for the two groups. To test the hypothesis that low-dose prednisone might influence the efficacy of the cytotoxic regimen used, the toxicity profiles of the two treatment regimens and the patterns of treatment failure (relapse, second malignancy, or death) were examined.
491 premenopausal and perimenopausal patients with one to three positive axillary lymph nodes included in International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) trial I from 1978 to 1981 and randomized to receive CMF or CMFp were analyzed for differences in long-term outcome and toxic events. The 250 patients assigned to CMF and prednisone received on the average 12% more cytotoxic drugs than those who received CMF alone.
The 13-year DFS for the CMFp group was 49% as compared to 52% for CMF alone, and the respective OS percents were 59% and 65%. Several toxic effects such as leukopenia, alopecia, mucositis and induced amenorrhea were reported at a similar incidence in the two treatment groups. Using cumulative incidence methodology for competing risks, we detected a statistically significant increase in first relapse in the skeleton for the CMFp group at 13 years follow-up with a relative risk (RR) of 2.06 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23 to 3.46; P = 0.004]. Patients with larger tumors in the CMFp regimen were especially subject to this increase with a RR for failure in the skeleton of 3.32 (95% CI, 1.57 to 7.02; P = 0.0005). CMFp-treated patients also had a larger proportion of second malignancies (not breast cancer), with RR of 3.34 (95% CI, 0.91 to 12.31; P = 0.09).
Low-dose continuous prednisone added to adjuvant CMF chemotherapy enabled the use of higher doses of cytotoxics. This increased dose had no beneficial effect on treatment outcome, but was associated with an increased risk for bone relapses and a small, not statistically significant increased incidence of second malignancies. The effects of steroids, which are widely used as antiemetics (oral or pulse injection) together with cytotoxics, should be investigated to identify their influence upon treatment outcome.
与单纯接受环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤、5-氟尿嘧啶(CMF)辅助治疗方案的患者相比,在CMF方案中添加低剂量泼尼松(P)可使患者接受更大剂量的细胞毒性药物。然而,两组的无病生存期和总生存期相似。为了验证低剂量泼尼松可能影响所用细胞毒性治疗方案疗效的假设,研究了两种治疗方案的毒性特征以及治疗失败模式(复发、第二原发性恶性肿瘤或死亡)。
分析了1978年至1981年国际(路德维希)乳腺癌研究组(IBCSG)试验I中纳入的491例绝经前和围绝经期、腋窝淋巴结1至3个阳性的患者,这些患者被随机分配接受CMF或CMFp治疗,以比较长期结局和毒性事件的差异。分配接受CMF和泼尼松治疗的250例患者平均比单纯接受CMF治疗的患者多接受12%的细胞毒性药物。
CMFp组的13年无病生存率为49%,而单纯CMF组为52%,各自的总生存率分别为59%和65%。两个治疗组中白细胞减少、脱发、粘膜炎和诱导性闭经等几种毒性作用的发生率相似。使用累积发病率方法分析竞争风险,我们发现在13年随访时,CMFp组骨骼首次复发有统计学显著增加,相对风险(RR)为2.06[95%置信区间(CI),1.23至3.46;P = 0.004]。CMFp方案中肿瘤较大的患者尤其容易出现这种增加,骨骼失败的RR为3.32(95%CI,1.57至7.02;P = 0.0005)。接受CMFp治疗的患者第二原发性恶性肿瘤(非乳腺癌)的比例也更高,RR为3.34(95%CI,0.91至12.31;P = 0.09)。
辅助CMF化疗中添加低剂量持续泼尼松可使用更高剂量的细胞毒性药物。这种增加的剂量对治疗结局没有有益影响,但与骨骼复发风险增加以及第二原发性恶性肿瘤发生率小幅增加(无统计学显著性)相关。应研究与细胞毒性药物一起广泛用作止吐药(口服或脉冲注射)的类固醇的作用,以确定它们对治疗结局的影响。