Suppr超能文献

尼群地平和依那普利治疗糖尿病合并微量白蛋白尿的高血压患者。

Nitrendipine and enalapril in the treatment of diabetic hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria.

作者信息

Piñol C, Cobos A, Cases A, Esmatges E, Soler J, Closas J, Pascual R, Planas J

机构信息

Hospital Clínic i Provincial, Hospitals Comarcals de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Kidney Int Suppl. 1996 Jun;55:S85-7.

PMID:8743519
Abstract

A trial to study the efficacy, safety and tolerability of nitrendipine and enalapril in the treatment of diabetic hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria (MA) was performed to compare the effects of both drugs in the prevention of the renal impairment. Twenty-eight valid patients [13 with nitrendipine (N) and 15 with enalapril (E) with NIDDM, hypertension (diastolic blood pressure between 90 to 114 mm Hg) and MA (urinary albumin between 30 to 300 mg/24 hr) were recruited in a double blind, randomized trial. Following a placebo run-in period of two to four weeks, all eligible patients were randomly allocated to either N or E treatment. Treatment lasted six months, with two different visits at three and six months in which blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), renal function and MA were measured. No statistically significant differences on BP and metabolic parameters were found between both treatment groups. The geometric mean of final glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the N group was 34.5% higher than in the E group, while the reduction on MA was most important in the E group. Eleven patients reported adverse events (AEs) and there were four dropouts, three of them due to AEs. We conclude that both treatments are a good choice for treating diabetic hypertensive patients with early altered renal function, as they reduce BP without altering metabolic parameters, increase GFR and reduce MA with a low frequency of AEs.

摘要

进行了一项研究尼群地平和依那普利治疗糖尿病高血压合并微量白蛋白尿(MA)患者的疗效、安全性和耐受性的试验,以比较两种药物在预防肾功能损害方面的效果。在一项双盲随机试验中招募了28例有效患者[13例服用尼群地平(N),15例服用依那普利(E)],均患有非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病、高血压(舒张压在90至114毫米汞柱之间)和MA(尿白蛋白在30至300毫克/24小时之间)。在进行了两到四周的安慰剂导入期后,所有符合条件的患者被随机分配接受N或E治疗。治疗持续六个月,在三个月和六个月时进行两次不同的访视,测量血压(BP)、心率(HR)、肾功能和MA。两个治疗组在BP和代谢参数方面未发现统计学上的显著差异。N组最终肾小球滤过率(GFR)的几何平均值比E组高34.5%,而E组MA的降低最为显著。11例患者报告了不良事件(AE),有4例退出,其中3例是由于AE。我们得出结论,两种治疗方法都是治疗早期肾功能改变的糖尿病高血压患者的良好选择,因为它们在不改变代谢参数的情况下降低BP,增加GFR并降低MA,且AE发生率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验