Hasle N J
Psykiatrisk afdeling Y, Amtssygehuset i Herlev. Ballerup.
Ugeskr Laeger. 1996 May 6;158(19):2692-6.
The aim of the study was to examine the dimensions and the nature of the deprivations of liberty to which psychiatric patients of 65 years of age and older are exposed. The diagnostic pattern of these patients was also investigated. The case records of 97 elderly patients that had been exposed to a deprivation of liberty during the five year period from 1 October 1989 to 30 September 1994 were reviewed. There were 63 compulsory commitments to the psychiatric department in Ballerup during this period. More elderly patients were committed due to a need for treatment (yellow admission papers) than due to their being dangerous to themselves or other people (red admission papers). There were proportionately more compulsory than voluntary commitments among patients of 65 years of age and over than among patients under the age of 65. Elderly women committed for treatment (yellow admission papers) were deprived of their liberty for a longer period than elderly men committed for the same reasons. The most frequent diagnosis on discharge from the hospital was senile dementia. There is a different pattern of deprivation of liberty among elderly psychiatric patients than among those under the age og 65. The legal aspects surrounding the largest group of elderly compulsory commitments have not yet been satisfactorily clarified.
该研究的目的是调查65岁及以上精神科患者所面临的自由剥夺的程度和性质。还对这些患者的诊断模式进行了调查。回顾了1989年10月1日至1994年9月30日这五年期间97名曾遭受自由剥夺的老年患者的病例记录。在此期间,有63人被强制送往巴勒鲁普的精神科。因需要治疗(黄色入院文件)而被收治的老年患者比因对自己或他人有危险(红色入院文件)而被收治的更多。65岁及以上患者中强制收治的比例高于65岁以下患者。因治疗(黄色入院文件)而被收治的老年女性被剥夺自由的时间比因同样原因被收治的老年男性更长。出院时最常见的诊断是老年痴呆症。老年精神科患者的自由剥夺模式与65岁以下患者不同。围绕最大群体的老年强制收治的法律问题尚未得到令人满意的澄清。