• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基层医疗中酒精使用障碍的诊断测试:不同工具的疗效比较

Diagnostic tests for alcoholism in primary health care: compared efficacy of different instruments.

作者信息

Escobar F, Espí F, Canteras M

机构信息

Zone IV Health Centre, Albacete, Spain.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995 Dec;40(2):151-8. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(95)01200-1.

DOI:10.1016/0376-8716(95)01200-1
PMID:8745137
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alcoholism is an uncommon diagnosis in normal medical activity despite being a prevalent health problem in Spain. One of the main obstacles that make diagnosis difficult is the lack of valid, reliable instruments of detection. The aim of the present study is to validate different tests for diagnosing alcoholism (CAGE, Alcohol Clinical Index, MCV, GGT, GOT/GPT and GGT/AP) in primary care and compare their diagnostic efficacy.

METHODS

The diagnostic efficacy and discriminating power of each of the tests were calculated from the results obtained from 219 patients (out of 698 aged over 15 years) who answered the CAGE questionnaire. Patients were selected from doctors surgeries in an urban health centre. The diagnosis of alcoholism was based on the presence of DSM-III criteria and/or a daily alcohol consumption of 60 grams or more in men and 30 or more in women.

RESULTS

The CAGE questionnaire showed a sensitivity of 69.86% and specificity of 80.46%, with the cut-off point at 1. The remaining tests showed a poorer diagnostic efficacy. The CAGE questionnaire scoring was the parameter that best distinguished alcoholic patients from non-alcoholic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAGE questionnaire demonstrates the greatest efficacy and discriminating power for diagnosing patients with alcoholism in primary care.

摘要

背景

尽管酗酒在西班牙是一个普遍存在的健康问题,但在正常医疗活动中它却是一种不常见的诊断。导致诊断困难的主要障碍之一是缺乏有效、可靠的检测工具。本研究的目的是验证在初级保健中用于诊断酗酒的不同测试(CAGE问卷、酒精临床指数、平均红细胞体积、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶、谷草转氨酶/谷丙转氨酶和γ-谷氨酰转肽酶/碱性磷酸酶),并比较它们的诊断效能。

方法

根据对219名(在698名15岁以上患者中)回答了CAGE问卷的患者所获得的结果,计算每个测试的诊断效能和鉴别能力。这些患者是从一个城市健康中心的医生诊所中挑选出来的。酗酒的诊断基于符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版标准和/或男性每日酒精摄入量60克或更多、女性30克或更多。

结果

CAGE问卷显示敏感性为69.86%,特异性为80.46%,临界值为1。其余测试显示出较差的诊断效能。CAGE问卷评分是区分酗酒患者和非酗酒患者的最佳参数。

结论

CAGE问卷在初级保健中诊断酗酒患者时显示出最大的效能和鉴别能力。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic tests for alcoholism in primary health care: compared efficacy of different instruments.基层医疗中酒精使用障碍的诊断测试:不同工具的疗效比较
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995 Dec;40(2):151-8. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(95)01200-1.
2
[An evaluation of the SMAST questionnaire for the diagnosis of alcoholism in primary care. The Self-Administered Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test].
Aten Primaria. 1994 Jun 30;14(2):627-30.
3
[Alcohol consumption and the diagnosis of alcoholic patients in primary care].[酒精消费与基层医疗中酒精性患者的诊断]
Aten Primaria. 1995 Jan;15(1):3-6.
4
The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a screening tool for excessive drinking in primary care: reliability and validity of a French version.酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)作为初级保健中过度饮酒的筛查工具:法语版本的可靠性和有效性。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Nov;29(11):2001-7. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000187034.58955.64.
5
Problems related to alcohol consumption in primary health care: prevalence and clinical profile.
Fam Pract. 1993 Dec;10(4):424-30. doi: 10.1093/fampra/10.4.424.
6
Joint use of clinical parameters, biological markers and CAGE questionnaire for the identification of heavy drinkers in a large population-based sample.联合使用临床参数、生物标志物和CAGE问卷在一个基于大样本人群的样本中识别重度饮酒者。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2003 Mar-Apr;38(2):121-7. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agg051.
7
Relative performance of the MAST, VAST, and CAGE versus DSM-III-R criteria for alcohol dependence.MAST、VAST和CAGE与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版(DSM-III-R)酒精依赖标准的相对效能。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 May;46(5):435-41. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90020-2.
8
[The diagnostic validity of screening tests and laboratory markers in alcohol use disorders].[酒精使用障碍筛查试验和实验室标志物的诊断效度]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2005 Spring;16(1):3-12.
9
Screening for excessive alcohol drinking. Comparative value of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin, gamma-glutamyltransferase, and mean corpuscular volume.过量饮酒筛查。缺糖转铁蛋白、γ-谷氨酰转移酶和平均红细胞体积的比较价值。
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Sep 25;155(17):1907-11. doi: 10.1001/archinte.155.17.1907.
10
[Diagnostic usefulness of Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) for detecting hazardous alcohol consumption in primary care settings].[酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)在基层医疗环境中检测危险饮酒的诊断效用]
Med Clin (Barc). 2001 Feb 3;116(4):121-4. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(01)71745-9.

引用本文的文献

1
High-performance detection and early prediction of septic shock for alcohol-use disorder patients.酒精使用障碍患者感染性休克的高性能检测与早期预测
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 May 10;8:50-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.04.023. eCollection 2016 Jun.