• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[喀麦隆牛瘟疫苗接种保护效果评估。II. 北部省]

[Evaluation of vaccinal protection against rinderpest in Cameroon. II. The North province].

作者信息

Ngangnou A, Zoyem N

机构信息

Laboratoire national vétérinaire, Garoua, Cameroun.

出版信息

Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop. 1995;48(3):236-8.

PMID:8745745
Abstract

Cameroon joined the sero-survey component of the PARC (Pan African Rinderpest Campaign) program in 1989. During the 1992 Campaign, a detailed sampling frame, adapted to the breeding conditions of the North Province was drawn up according to PARC recommendations. The four administrative divisions of the province were covered by sampling cattle in 14 sites chosen by randomisation. Eight thousand six hundred and eighty sera samples from 217 cattle herds were tested using FAO/IAEA rinderpest competitive ELISA technique. The results indicated an overall prevalence of rinderpest virus antibodies (RPVA) of 66%. This is below the target objective. The differences of prevalence between age groups and breeding systems (sedentary of transhumant) are statistically significant. The same results have been reported in the Adamaoua Province (62% in 1991 campaign). These results do not reflect the situation in all the country. It is suggested to hold general meeting between different livestock managers from the provinces with high cattle populations to adopt commun vaccination measures with the target objective of increasing the level of immunity.

摘要

喀麦隆于1989年加入泛非牛瘟防治运动(PARC)项目的血清学调查部分。在1992年的防治运动期间,根据PARC的建议,制定了一个适合北部省份养殖条件的详细抽样框架。该省的四个行政区通过随机选择14个地点的抽样牛群进行覆盖。使用粮农组织/国际原子能机构牛瘟竞争ELISA技术对来自217个牛群的8680份血清样本进行了检测。结果表明,牛瘟病毒抗体(RPVA)的总体流行率为66%。这低于目标值。年龄组和养殖系统(定居或游牧)之间的流行率差异具有统计学意义。阿达马瓦省也报告了相同的结果(1991年防治运动中为62%)。这些结果并未反映全国的情况。建议在牛群数量较多的省份的不同畜牧管理人员之间召开大会,采取共同的疫苗接种措施,目标是提高免疫水平。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of vaccinal protection against rinderpest in Cameroon. II. The North province].[喀麦隆牛瘟疫苗接种保护效果评估。II. 北部省]
Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop. 1995;48(3):236-8.
2
[Evaluation of vaccinal protection against rinderpest in Cameroon. III. General evaluation].[喀麦隆牛瘟疫苗接种保护效果评估。III. 总体评估]
Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop. 1996;49(1):18-22.
3
[Evaluation of the vaccinal protection against rinderpest in Cameroon. I. Province of Adamaoua].[喀麦隆牛瘟疫苗接种保护效果评估。一、阿达马瓦省]
Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop. 1994;47(1):35-7.
4
[Control of post-vaccinal immunity against rinderpest after the 1989 and 1990 vaccination campaigns in Ivory Coast].
Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop. 1991;44(4):415-21.
5
[Evaluation of serological protection against cattle rinderpest of bovine livestock in Chad].[乍得牛群抗牛瘟血清学保护评估]
Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop. 1989;42(2):163-7.
6
[Epidemiology of rinderpest and cattle plague in Mali: serological surveys].[马里牛瘟和牛疫流行病学:血清学调查]
Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop. 1996;49(4):273-7.
7
Interference in the vaccination of cattle against rinderpest virus by antibodies against peste des petits ruminants (PPR) virus.抗小反刍兽疫(PPR)病毒抗体对牛瘟病毒疫苗接种的干扰。
Vaccine. 2006 Jul 17;24(29-30):5679-83. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.04.052. Epub 2006 May 15.
8
[Rinderpest protection of bovines by measles virus. II. Vaccination of calves born from cows vaccinated with the MB 113 strain].麻疹病毒对牛瘟的保护作用。II. 用MB 113株疫苗接种母牛所产犊牛的免疫接种
Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop. 1971;24(2):167-72.
9
[Serological survey in a Sahelian country, the Niger. Sampling problems and results of the serosurveillance of rinderpest].[在一个萨赫勒国家尼日尔进行的血清学调查。牛瘟血清监测的抽样问题与结果]
Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop. 1990;43(3):305-11.
10
Inexpensive vaccines and rapid diagnostic kits tailor-made for the global eradication of rinderpest, and technology transfer to Africa and Asia.为全球根除牛瘟量身定制的廉价疫苗和快速诊断试剂盒,以及向非洲和亚洲的技术转让。
Dev Biol (Basel). 2003;114:99-111.