• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨膜下除皱术:并发症与不满意的患者。

Subperiosteal facelifting: complications and the dissatisfied patient.

作者信息

Scheflan M, Maillard G F, Cornette de St Cyr B, Ramirez O M

机构信息

Plastic & Aesthetic Surgical Center of Maryland, Baltimore 21093, USA.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1996 Winter;20(1):33-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02275573.

DOI:10.1007/BF02275573
PMID:8746468
Abstract

As endoscopic subperiosteal lifting of the upper face is explored, it may significantly limit the indications for the open approach. However, this report is based on our combined large experience and long follow-up in open bicoronal subperiosteal lifting. The combined experience of four surgeons in four countries with an open subperiosteal approach to lifting of the upper face in 545 patients is described. The complications of the procedure, both common and rare, and techniques to avoid untoward effects are discussed. Reasons for patient dissatisfaction are addressed. Based on their evaluation of results and complications of the surgery over a 6-year period (1986-1992), we conclude that subperiosteal lifting is an effective, reliable, reproducible, and safe operation.

摘要

随着对上脸内镜下骨膜下提升术的探索,它可能会显著限制开放手术的适应症。然而,本报告基于我们在开放性双冠状骨膜下提升术方面的丰富经验和长期随访。描述了四个国家的四位外科医生采用开放性骨膜下提升术对上脸进行手术的545例患者的综合经验。讨论了该手术常见和罕见的并发症以及避免不良影响的技术。探讨了患者不满意的原因。基于他们对1986年至1992年这6年期间手术结果和并发症的评估,我们得出结论,骨膜下提升术是一种有效、可靠、可重复且安全的手术。

相似文献

1
Subperiosteal facelifting: complications and the dissatisfied patient.骨膜下除皱术:并发症与不满意的患者。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1996 Winter;20(1):33-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02275573.
2
[Complications in face lifting].[面部提升术的并发症]
Z Plast Chir. 1981 Dec;5(4):234-40.
3
Supraperiosteal lifting of the upper two-thirds of the face.
Br J Plast Surg. 1991 Jul;44(5):325-32. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(91)90143-8.
4
The subperiosteal bicoronal approach to total facelifting: the DMAS--deep musculoaponeurotic system.全脸提升的骨膜下双冠状切口入路:DMAS——深层肌筋膜系统。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1991 Fall;15(4):285-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02273874.
5
Endoscopic subperiosteal midface lift: surgical technique with indications and outcomes.内镜下骨膜下中面部提升术:手术技术、适应证及疗效
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Sep;18(5):319-30; discussion 329-30. doi: 10.1097/01.IOP.0000024426.47148.49.
6
[Endoscopic forehead, face and neck lifting].
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1999 Jan;31(1):37-41. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-13489.
7
Subperiosteal minimally invasive laser endoscopic rhytidectomy: the SMILE facelift.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1996 Nov-Dec;20(6):463-70. doi: 10.1007/BF00449248.
8
Subperiosteal midface lifting: a simplified approach.
Ann Plast Surg. 2004 Mar;52(3):293-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000106889.40733.85.
9
Endoscopic subperiosteal browlift and facelift.
Clin Plast Surg. 1995 Oct;22(4):639-60.
10
Mask lift and facial aesthetic sculpturing.面具提升术与面部美学塑形
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Jan;95(1):21-36. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199501000-00004.

本文引用的文献

1
The anchor subperiosteal forehead lift.锚定骨膜下前额提升术。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 May;95(6):993-1003; discussion 1004-6.
2
The subperiosteal approach for the correction of the deep nasolabial fold and the central third of the face.用于矫正鼻唇沟深部及面部中央三分之一区域的骨膜下入路。
Clin Plast Surg. 1995 Apr;22(2):341-56.
3
Subperiosteal approach as an improved concept for correction of the aging face.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988 Sep;82(3):383-94. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198809000-00001.
4
[Subperiosteal face-lift].[骨膜下除皱术]
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1989;34(3):199-211.
5
[Subperiosteal face-lift].[骨膜下除皱术]
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1989;34(3):193-7.
6
The extended subperiosteal face lift: a definitive soft-tissue remodeling for facial rejuvenation.扩展骨膜下除皱术:一种用于面部年轻化的确定性软组织重塑术。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991 Aug;88(2):227-36; discussion 237-8.