Suppr超能文献

延髓尾端腹外侧和中缝髓质神经元的轴突投射,其活动与交感神经放电的10赫兹节律相关。

Axonal projections of caudal ventrolateral medullary and medullary raphe neurons with activity correlated to the 10-Hz rhythm in sympathetic nerve discharge.

作者信息

Barman S M, Orer H S, Gebber G L

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824, USA.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1995 Dec;74(6):2295-308. doi: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.6.2295.

Abstract
  1. This is the first study to map the axonal projections of medullary neurons that are elements of the network responsible for the 10-Hz rhythm in sympathetic nerve discharge (SND) of urethan-anesthetized cats. Spike-triggered averaging and coherence analysis were used to identify caudal ventrolateral medullary (CVLM) and medullary raphe neurons with activity correlated to this component of SND. Spike-triggered averaging showed that CVLM neurons fired significantly earlier (17 ms on the average) than raphe neurons during the 10-Hz slow wave in inferior cardiac postganglionic SND. This observation raised the possibility that CVLM neurons are a source of the discharges of raphe neurons that are correlated to SND. 2. Nineteen of 47 CVLM neurons with activity correlated to the 10-Hz rhythm in SND were antidromically activated by micro-stimulation of the raphe. The longest onset latency of antidromic activation was 19.9 +/- 2.8 (SE) ms, a value comparable with the difference in firing times of CVLM and raphe neurons during the naturally occurring 10-Hz slow wave in inferior cardiac SND. In most cases the response likely reflected activation of an axonal branch of the CVLM neuron, because the onset latency of antidromic activation could be changed dramatically by moving the stimulating microelectrode as little as 0.2 mm within the raphe. Also, the onset latency of antidromic activation of nine CVLM neurons was significantly shortened (25.0 +/- 2.5 vs. 16.7 +/- 2.7 ms) when the stimulus intensity was raised above threshold. 3. The hypothesis that the axons of CVLM neurons with activity correlated to the 10-Hz rhythm in SND terminated on and excited raphe neurons was supported by the following observations. First, CVLM neurons could not be antidromically activated by stimuli applied to sites in tracks located 1.5-2 mm lateral to the midline, contralateral to the neuronal recording site; thus their axons did not cross the midline. Second, some CVLM neurons could be antidromically activated by stimuli applied to sites in only one of the tracks through the midline; thus it is unlikely that their axons were destined for more rostral or caudal portions of the brain stem. Third, 37% of the raphe neurons with activity correlated to the 10-Hz rhythm were synaptically activated by microstimulation of the CVLM, with a minimum onset latency of 18.1 +/- 2.6 ms. This value was not significantly different than the longest onset latency of antidromic activation of CVLM neurons by raphe stimulation. 4. CVLM neurons with activity correlated to the 10-Hz rhythm in SND could not be antidromically activated by microstimulation of the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) or thoracic spinal cord. Thus CVLM neurons are not a direct source of the 10-Hz discharges of RVLM or preganglionic sympathetic neurons. 5. Eight of 41 raphe neurons with activity correlated to the 10-Hz rhythm in SND were antidromically activated by microstimulation of the CVLM. The latency of the antidromic response of six raphe neurons was shortened from 15.2 +/- 3.1 to 11.9 +/- 3.1 ms by raising stimulus current above threshold, implying the existence of local axonal branching. The onset latency of antidromic activation of five raphe neurons was changed by moving the stimulating microelectrode within the CVLM. 6. The axons of at least some of these raphe neurons likely terminated in the CVLM, because higher current was required to antidromically activate these neurons from sites in a track located 0.5 mm further laterally, and they were not antidromically activated by microstimulation of the RVLM. Also 32% of the CVLM neurons were either excited or inhibited by microstimulation of the raphe. The minimum onset latency of synaptic activation (18.3 +/- 4.2 ms) or inhibition (10-20 ms) of CVLM neurons by raphe stimulation was similar to the longest onset latency of antidromic activation of raphe neurons by CVLM microstimulation. 7. These data are consistent with the view
摘要
  1. 本研究首次描绘了延髓神经元的轴突投射,这些神经元是负责乌拉坦麻醉猫交感神经放电(SND)中10Hz节律的网络组成部分。采用锋电位触发平均法和相干分析来识别与SND这一成分活动相关的尾侧腹外侧延髓(CVLM)和延髓中缝神经元。锋电位触发平均法显示,在心脏下神经节后SND的10Hz慢波期间,CVLM神经元的放电明显早于中缝神经元(平均早17毫秒)。这一观察结果提示,CVLM神经元可能是与SND相关的中缝神经元放电的来源。2. 47个与SND中10Hz节律活动相关的CVLM神经元中,有19个通过中缝的微刺激被逆向激活。逆向激活的最长起始潜伏期为19.9±2.8(SE)毫秒,这一数值与心脏下SND自然发生的10Hz慢波期间CVLM和中缝神经元放电时间的差异相当。在大多数情况下,这种反应可能反映了CVLM神经元轴突分支的激活,因为在中缝内将刺激微电极移动仅0.2毫米,逆向激活的起始潜伏期就可能发生显著变化。此外,当刺激强度提高到阈值以上时,9个CVLM神经元的逆向激活起始潜伏期显著缩短(25.0±2.5对16.7±2.7毫秒)。3. 以下观察结果支持了这样的假说,即与SND中10Hz节律活动相关的CVLM神经元轴突终止于并兴奋中缝神经元。首先,施加于与神经元记录部位对侧、中线外侧1.5 - 2毫米处轨迹部位的刺激不能逆向激活CVLM神经元;因此它们的轴突不穿过中线。其次,一些CVLM神经元仅通过施加于穿过中线的一条轨迹部位的刺激就能被逆向激活;因此它们的轴突不太可能伸向脑干的更靠前或更靠后的部分。第三,37%的与10Hz节律活动相关的中缝神经元通过CVLM的微刺激被突触激活,最小起始潜伏期为18. i±2.6毫秒。该数值与中缝刺激逆向激活CVLM神经元的最长起始潜伏期无显著差异。4. 与SND中10Hz节律活动相关的CVLM神经元不能通过延髓头端腹外侧(RVLM)或胸段脊髓的微刺激被逆向激活。因此,CVLM神经元不是RVLM或节前交感神经元10Hz放电的直接来源。5. 41个与SND中10Hz节律活动相关的中缝神经元中有8个通过CVLM的微刺激被逆向激活。通过将刺激电流提高到阈值以上,6个中缝神经元的逆向反应潜伏期从15.2±3.1毫秒缩短至11.9±3.1毫秒,这意味着存在局部轴突分支。通过在CVLM内移动刺激微电极,5个中缝神经元的逆向激活起始潜伏期发生了变化。6. 至少其中一些中缝神经元的轴突可能终止于CVLM,因为从外侧0.5毫米处的轨迹部位逆向激活这些神经元需要更高的电流,并且它们不能通过RVLM的微刺激被逆向激活。此外,32%的CVLM神经元通过中缝的微刺激被兴奋或抑制。中缝刺激对CVLM神经元突触激活(18.3±4.2毫秒)或抑制(10 - 20毫秒)的最小起始潜伏期与CVLM微刺激逆向激活中缝神经元的最长起始潜伏期相似。7. 这些数据与以下观点一致

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验