Fernandes C M, Christenson J M
Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Emerg Med. 1995 Nov-Dec;13(6):847-55. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(95)02023-3.
Application of Continuous Quality Improvement techniques can identify (a) major causes of delay in evaluation and treatment of ambulatory patients in an Emergency Department (ED) and (b) rational solutions to reduce those delays. To confirm this hypothesis, a prospective interventional study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital with 50,000 emergency visits per year. Participants included all patients discharged from the ED in three separate time periods. A formal continuous quality improvement process was used to document the current process of ambulatory care patient flow and prioritize the causes of delay. Solutions were defined and presented to the hospital administration. Two solutions were implemented immediately. The effect of these changes was assessed by comparing the time interval from presentation to discharge from the ED (length of stay) and the time interval from presentation to generation of a chart (chart generation). These differences were compared by analysis of variance on consecutive patients seen in a 48-hour control period and two postintervention 48-hour periods. The interventions that were identified and immediately implemented were the addition of an admission clerk and the reduction of the Fast-Track nurse function to include only patient placement and vital signs. The length of stay for all patients was significantly reduced from a mean of 163 +/- 170 min to 115 +/- 86 and 122 +/- 105 min in two separate postintervention 48-hour samples. The mean length of stay for Fast-Track patients not requiring X-ray, electrocardiogram, or blood tests was 92 +/- 46 min. After the intervention, this was reduced to 73 +/- 46 and 67 +/- 31 min in the same two 48-hour samples. Chart generation times were significantly reduced from a mean of 21 +/- 18 min to 8 +/- 6 min. We conclude that the formal application of Continuous Quality Improvement techniques in the Emergency Department can result in appropriate changes in the process of patient flow, leading to measurable and significant reductions in length of stay for Fast-Track patients.
(a) 急诊科(ED)门诊患者评估和治疗延迟的主要原因;(b) 减少这些延迟的合理解决方案。为证实这一假设,在一家每年有50000例急诊就诊量的三级护理教学医院开展了一项前瞻性干预研究。研究对象包括在三个不同时间段从急诊科出院的所有患者。采用正式的持续质量改进流程记录门诊患者流程的当前情况,并确定延迟原因的优先级。定义了解决方案并提交给医院管理层。立即实施了两项解决方案。通过比较从就诊到出院的时间间隔(住院时间)以及从就诊到生成病历的时间间隔(病历生成时间)来评估这些改变的效果。通过对在48小时对照期和两个干预后48小时期间就诊的连续患者进行方差分析来比较这些差异。确定并立即实施的干预措施是增加一名入院办事员,并减少快速通道护士的职责,使其仅负责患者安置和生命体征检查。在两个独立的干预后48小时样本中,所有患者的住院时间从平均163±170分钟显著缩短至115±86分钟和122±105分钟。不需要进行X光、心电图或血液检查的快速通道患者的平均住院时间为92±46分钟。干预后,在相同的两个48小时样本中,这一数字降至73±46分钟和67±31分钟。病历生成时间从平均21±18分钟显著缩短至8±6分钟。我们得出结论,在急诊科正式应用持续质量改进技术可导致患者流程发生适当改变,从而使快速通道患者的住院时间显著且可测量地缩短。