Clarke S M, Thurlow S M, Hilmas D E
EG&G Rocky Flats, Inc., Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site, Health Effects Department, Golden, CO 80402-0464, USA.
Toxicol Ind Health. 1995 Jul-Aug;11(4):399-411. doi: 10.1177/074823379501100403.
This paper demonstrates that current standards used by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to establish an area free from potential beryllium contamination may be inadequate. Using the Beryllium Antibody Assay, it was shown that workers exposed to former beryllium work areas, thought to be sanitized and to meet OSHA standards, experienced statistically significant rises in blood beryllium antibody titers. This finding raises the question of whether the equipment currently required to protect workers in beryllium-laden environments is sufficient. The project mission of decommissioning/decontaminating the former nuclear weapons plant at Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS), instituted in 1992, has necessitated development of new technology directed toward safe and responsible cleanup. Challenges have been posed not only by the need to dispose of radioactive and chemical waste, but also by the problem of cleaning up hazardous metals such as the element beryllium. Beryllium was used extensively in research and the manufacture of nuclear weapons components at Rocky Flats for over 40 years. Since inhalation of this element can induce chronic beryllium disease (Eisenbud and Lisson, 1983), an antibody assay was developed to screen workers for internal exposure to beryllium. Exposure is indicated by a titer of antibodies greater than two standard deviations above a normal population control (defined as the mean titer of pooled samples from 51 individuals with no known exposure to beryllium) and a p-value of < 0.05. This paper describes two new applications for the assay: risk assessment and health surveillance. Case study 1 involves a team of three workers who cleaned a beryllium plenum and whose beryllium antibody titers provided a quantitative assessment of their exposure. Case study 2 describes the use of the antibody assay to determine the probable manner in which one worker was exposed to beryllium while performing his duties as an architectural engineer.
本文表明,美国职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)用于确定无潜在铍污染区域的现行标准可能并不充分。通过铍抗体检测发现,接触过原铍作业区域(这些区域被认为已进行消毒且符合OSHA标准)的工人,其血液中铍抗体滴度出现了具有统计学意义的升高。这一发现引发了一个问题,即当前用于保护在含铍环境中工作的工人的设备是否足够。1992年启动的在落基弗拉特环境技术基地(RFETS)对原核武器工厂进行退役/去污处理的项目任务,促使了旨在进行安全且负责的清理工作的新技术的开发。面临的挑战不仅来自于处理放射性和化学废物的需求,还来自于清理诸如铍元素等危险金属的问题。在落基弗拉特,铍在核武器部件的研究和制造中被广泛使用了40多年。由于吸入这种元素会诱发慢性铍病(艾森巴德和利森,1983年),因此开发了一种抗体检测方法来筛查工人是否存在体内铍暴露。当抗体滴度高于正常人群对照组均值两个标准差以上(正常人群对照组定义为来自51名无已知铍暴露个体的混合样本的平均滴度)且p值<0.05时,即表明存在暴露。本文描述了该检测方法的两种新应用:风险评估和健康监测。案例研究1涉及一组三名清理铍通风室的工人,他们的铍抗体滴度对其暴露情况进行了定量评估。案例研究2描述了如何使用抗体检测来确定一名建筑工程师在履行职责时可能接触铍的方式。