Dykens E
Yale Child Study Center, USA.
Res Dev Disabil. 1996 Jan-Feb;17(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(95)00032-1.
As a widely used, easy-to-administer, and nonthreatening task, the Draw-a-Person (DAP) holds particular promise as a nonverbal index of intelligence in persons with mental retardation. The DAPs of 108 adolescents and adults with mental retardation were reliably scored using Naglieri's cognitive and emotional disturbance scoring systems. Contrary to expectations, visual-motor skills emerged as the best predictor of DAP cognitive scores. Intelligence was correlated with DAP scores, but had considerably less predictive value than visual-motor skills. DAP emotional indicator scores were only modestly associated with social adaptation; even less support was found linking DAP emotional indicators to psychopathology. Findings point to considerable caution in using the DAP as an index of intelligence or as a screen for adjustment problems or specific psychopathology. Although related to intelligence, this popular task seems predominantly to measure visual-motor development in adults with mental retardation.
作为一种广泛使用、易于实施且无威胁性的任务,画人测验(DAP)有望成为评估智力发育迟缓者智力水平的一种非语言指标。运用纳吉里的认知与情绪障碍评分系统,对108名患有智力发育迟缓的青少年及成年人的画人测验结果进行了可靠评分。与预期相反,视觉运动技能成为画人测验认知分数的最佳预测指标。智力与画人测验分数相关,但预测价值远低于视觉运动技能。画人测验的情绪指标分数与社会适应仅有适度关联;将画人测验情绪指标与精神病理学联系起来的证据更少。研究结果表明,在将画人测验用作智力指标或用于筛查适应问题或特定精神病理学时,需格外谨慎。尽管该测验与智力相关,但这项广受欢迎的任务似乎主要测量的是智力发育迟缓成年人的视觉运动发育情况。