• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长春新碱、阿霉素、环磷酰胺、强的松和依托泊苷(VACPE)治疗高级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤——一项多中心II期研究

Vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, prednisone and etoposide (VACPE) in high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma--a multicenter phase II study.

作者信息

Bergmann L, Karakas T, Lautenschlager G, Jager E, Knuth A, Mitrou P S, Hoelzer D

机构信息

Medical Clinic III, Hematology/Oncology, J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 1995 Dec;6(10):1019-24. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059066.

DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059066
PMID:8750155
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) can potentially be cured by intensive chemotherapy. However, many patients still die of their disease, which underscores the need to define patient groups with different long-term prognoses and for more effective and possibly risk-adapted treatment approaches.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this phase II study we investigated the feasibility and efficacy of a polychemotherapy consisting of 2 mg vincristine (V) on day 1, 25 mg/m2 doxorubicin (A) days 1-3, 800 mg cyclophosphamide (C) day 1, 60 mg/m2 prednisone (P) days 1-7 and 120 mg/m2 etoposide (E) days 1-3. This cycle (VACPE) was repeated on day 22 for up to 5 cycles in stages I-III and 6 cycles in stage IV, respectively, followed by consolidating radiotherapy in 38/73 patients. A total of 75 patients with high-grade NHLs according to the Kiel classification were eligible, and 73 patients are evaluable for response. The predominant histological subtypes were centroblastic, pleomorphic T-cell and large-cell anaplastic lymphomas, 60% of the patients presented with stage III/IV, 55% with a poor performance status (ECOG > or = 2), 53% with B symptoms and 60% with a LDH level >200 U/l.

RESULTS

57/73 patients achieved CR (78%), and the overall response rate (CR-PR) was 95%. The median observation time is 40 months (10+-74+). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survivals for the entire VACPE group were 79%, 64% and 61%, respectively. Forty-one patients are in ongoing CR with a continuous complete remission rate (CCR) of 67%. Fourteen of the 16 patients who relapsed (88%) did so within the first 24 months. The predicted 1-, 3- and 5-year DFS for those patients who achieved CR is 83%, 67% and 67%, respectively. The early mortality was 3/73 (4.1%). In patients with reduced performance status the overall survival (OS) (ECOG > or = 2) was significantly reduced, with a predicted 1-, 3- and 5-year survival of 62%, 49% and 49% versus 100%, 84% and 77% in patients with favorable performance status, respectively (p = 0.001). The predicted overall survival in stages III/IV is worse than in early stages with a 1-, 3- and 5-year probability of 73%, 52% and 52% versus 90%, 86% and 78%, respectively (p = 0.02). Comparison of patient groups with cumulative risk factors shows a significant decrease in overall survival. Especially in patients with 0-2 risk factors versus those presenting with >2 risk factors, there is a significantly better 3- and 5-year survival (p = 0.002). In contrast to overall survival, there were no differences between the listed risk groups concerning the disease-free survival of complete responders.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the VACPE regime is feasible and effective in high-grade NHLs and may also be administered on an outpatient basis. Despite encouraging data, however, a prospective randomized trial is warranted to define a possible superiority to standard CHOP. However, this regimen may be the basis for further randomized and risk adapted innovative approaches for high-grade NHLs.

摘要

背景

高级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者有可能通过强化化疗治愈。然而,许多患者仍死于该疾病,这突出表明需要明确具有不同长期预后的患者群体,并采用更有效且可能根据风险调整的治疗方法。

患者与方法

在这项II期研究中,我们调查了一种联合化疗方案的可行性和疗效,该方案包括第1天使用2mg长春新碱(V)、第1 - 3天使用25mg/m²阿霉素(A)、第1天使用800mg环磷酰胺(C)、第1 - 7天使用60mg/m²泼尼松(P)以及第1 - 3天使用120mg/m²依托泊苷(E)。此周期(VACPE)分别在第22天重复,I - III期最多重复5个周期,IV期重复6个周期,随后38/73例患者接受巩固性放疗。根据基尔分类,共有75例高级别NHL患者符合条件,73例患者可评估疗效。主要组织学亚型为中心母细胞性、多形性T细胞和大细胞间变性淋巴瘤,60%的患者为III/IV期,55%的患者体能状态较差(ECOG≥2),53%的患者有B症状,60%的患者乳酸脱氢酶水平>200U/L。

结果

57/73例患者达到完全缓解(CR)(78%),总缓解率(CR + PR)为95%。中位观察时间为40个月(10±74+)。整个VACPE组的1年、3年和5年总生存率分别为79%、64%和61%。41例患者持续完全缓解,持续完全缓解率(CCR)为67%。16例复发患者中有14例(88%)在最初24个月内复发。达到CR的患者预计1年、3年和5年无病生存率分别为83%、67%和67%。早期死亡率为3/73(4.1%)。体能状态较差的患者(ECOG≥2)总生存期(OS)显著降低,预计1年、3年和5年生存率分别为62%、49%和49%,而体能状态良好的患者分别为100%、84%和77%(p = 0.001)。III/IV期患者的预计总生存期比早期患者差,1年、3年和5年生存率分别为73%、52%和52%,而早期患者分别为90%、86%和78%(p = 0.02)。对具有累积风险因素的患者组进行比较,总生存期显著降低。特别是0 - 2个风险因素的患者与>2个风险因素的患者相比,3年和5年生存率显著更高(p = 0.002)。与总生存期不同,在列出风险组的完全缓解者的无病生存期方面没有差异。

结论

总之,VACPE方案在高级别NHL中可行且有效,也可在门诊实施。然而,尽管有令人鼓舞的数据,但仍需要进行前瞻性随机试验以确定其相对于标准CHOP方案的可能优势。然而,该方案可能是进一步针对高级别NHL进行随机和根据风险调整的创新方法的基础。

相似文献

1
Vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, prednisone and etoposide (VACPE) in high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma--a multicenter phase II study.长春新碱、阿霉素、环磷酰胺、强的松和依托泊苷(VACPE)治疗高级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤——一项多中心II期研究
Ann Oncol. 1995 Dec;6(10):1019-24. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059066.
2
Peripheral T-cell lymphomas respond well to vincristine, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, prednisone and etoposide (VACPE) and have a similar outcome as high-grade B-cell lymphomas.外周T细胞淋巴瘤对长春新碱、阿霉素、环磷酰胺、泼尼松和依托泊苷(VACPE)反应良好,其预后与高级别B细胞淋巴瘤相似。
Leuk Lymphoma. 1996 Dec;24(1-2):121-9. doi: 10.3109/10428199609045720.
3
Randomised comparison of CHOEP versus alternating hCHOP/IVEP for high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: treatment results and prognostic factor analysis in a multi-centre trial.CHOP方案与交替使用hCHOP/IVEP方案治疗高级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤的随机对照研究:一项多中心试验的治疗结果及预后因素分析
Ann Oncol. 1994 Jan;5(1):49-55. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058690.
4
Phase II study of infusional chemotherapy with doxorubicin, vincristine and etoposide plus cyclophosphamide and prednisone (I-CHOPE) in resistant diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: CALGB 9255. Cancer and Leukemia Group B.多柔比星、长春新碱、依托泊苷联合环磷酰胺及泼尼松的输注化疗方案(I-CHOPE)用于难治性弥漫性侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的II期研究:癌症与白血病B组研究(CALGB 9255)
Ann Oncol. 2000 Sep;11(9):1141-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1008395400069.
5
Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.标准方案(CHOP)与三种强化化疗方案治疗晚期非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 8;328(14):1002-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304083281404.
6
Phase III trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) versus cisplatin, etoposide, bleomycin and prednisone (CisEBP) for the treatment of advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of high grade malignancy. The Danish Lymphoma Study Group.环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松(CHOP方案)对比顺铂、依托泊苷、博来霉素和泼尼松(CisEBP方案)治疗晚期高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的III期试验。丹麦淋巴瘤研究组。
Acta Oncol. 1990;29(8):995-9. doi: 10.3109/02841869009091789.
7
A randomized EPOCH vs. CHOP front-line therapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: long-term results.一项针对侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的随机EPOCH与CHOP一线治疗对比研究:长期结果
Ann Oncol. 1999 Dec;10(12):1489-92. doi: 10.1023/a:1008395014398.
8
Treatment of relapsed aggressive lymphomas: regimens with and without high-dose therapy and stem cell rescue.复发侵袭性淋巴瘤的治疗:含与不含高剂量治疗及干细胞救援的方案
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2002 May;49 Suppl 1:S13-20. doi: 10.1007/s00280-002-0447-1. Epub 2002 Apr 12.
9
Addition of etoposide to CHOP chemotherapy in untreated patients with high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.在未经治疗的高级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中,将依托泊苷添加到CHOP化疗方案中。
Ann Oncol. 1998 Nov;9(11):1213-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1008446430765.
10
Prednimustine, mitoxantrone (PmM) vs cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone (COP) for the treatment of advanced low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group.泼尼松氮芥、米托蒽醌(PmM)与环磷酰胺、长春新碱、泼尼松(COP)治疗晚期低度非霍奇金淋巴瘤。德国低度淋巴瘤研究组
Leukemia. 1996 May;10(5):836-43.