Baronciani D, Scaglia C, Corchia C, Torcetta F, Mastroiacovo P
Divisione Patologia Neonatale, Ospedale di Lecco, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Prenat Diagn. 1995 Dec;15(12):1101-8. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970151204.
The aim of the present study was to assess the sensitivity of ultrasound diagnosis used as a screening test in detecting major congenital anomalies in the prenatal period in a large nation-based multicentre setting. Data from the IPIMC register were collected in the period 1986-1990. One hundred and thirty-five hospitals, located in 17 out of the 20 regions in Italy, participated in the register. Study cases were 3479 infants with major congenital anomalies diagnosed at birth or in the first week of life. Subjects with chromosomal anomalies or multiple defects were excluded. The sensitivity of ultrasound prenatal diagnosis was 49.5 per cent for central nervous system anomalies, 3.8 per cent for congenital heart diseases, 17.1 per cent for gastrointestinal tract defects, 46.6 per cent for abdominal wall defects, 74.8 per cent for urinary tract anomalies, and 22.9 per cent for skeletal abnormalities. The detection rate for diaphragmatic hernia was 24.2 per cent. Overall, only 18 per cent of the defects diagnosed in utero were detected before 24 weeks' gestation. The sensitivity of prenatal diagnosis was 30.1 and 19.0 per cent in the northern, central, and southern regions, respectively. In light of its low sensitivity, ultrasonography as a screening test in the general population should be abandoned, although some improvement in its performance should be expected following adequate training of the ultrasound staff and the use of good technical equipment.
本研究的目的是在一个基于全国的多中心环境中,评估超声诊断作为一种筛查测试在产前检测主要先天性异常方面的敏感性。1986 - 1990年期间收集了来自IPIMC登记处的数据。位于意大利20个地区中17个地区的135家医院参与了该登记处。研究病例为3479名在出生时或出生后第一周被诊断出患有主要先天性异常的婴儿。排除了患有染色体异常或多种缺陷的受试者。超声产前诊断对中枢神经系统异常的敏感性为49.5%,对先天性心脏病的敏感性为3.8%,对胃肠道缺陷的敏感性为17.1%,对腹壁缺陷的敏感性为46.6%,对泌尿系统异常的敏感性为74.8%,对骨骼异常的敏感性为22.9%。膈疝的检出率为24.2%。总体而言,子宫内诊断出的缺陷中只有18%在妊娠24周前被检测到。产前诊断在北部、中部和南部地区的敏感性分别为30.1%和19.0%。鉴于其低敏感性,超声检查作为普通人群的筛查测试应该被放弃,尽管在对超声工作人员进行充分培训并使用良好的技术设备后,预计其性能会有所改善。