Suppr超能文献

医疗保健财务管理局的医疗质量改进计划:医学信息学面临的挑战。

HCFA's health care quality improvement program: the medical informatics challenge.

作者信息

Grant J B, Hayes R P, Pates R D, Elward K S, Ballard D J

机构信息

Emory University Center for Clinical Evaluation Sciences, Decatur, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996 Jan-Feb;3(1):15-26. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1996.96342646.

Abstract

The peer-review organizations (PROs) were created by Congress in 1984 to monitor the cost and quality of care received by Medicare beneficiaries. In order to do this, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) contracted with the PROs through a series of contracts referred to as "Scopes of Work." Under the Fourth Scope of Work, the HCFA initiated the Health Care Quality Improvement Program (HCQIP) in 1990, as an application of the principles of continuous quality improvement. Since then, the PROs have participated with health care providers in cooperative projects to improve the quality of primarily inpatient care provided to Medicare beneficiaries. Through HCFA-supplied administrative data and clinical data abstracted from patient records, the PROs have been able to identify opportunities for improvements in patient care. In May 1995, the HCFA proposed a new Fifth Scope of Work, which will shift the focus of HCQIP from inpatient care projects to projects in outpatient and managed care settings. This article describes the HCQIP process, the types of data used by the PROs to conduct cooperative projects with health care providers, and the informatics challenges in improving the quality of care received by Medicare beneficiaries.

摘要

同行评审组织(PROs)于1984年由国会设立,旨在监督医疗保险受益人的医疗费用和质量。为实现这一目标,医疗保健财务管理局(HCFA)通过一系列被称为“工作范围”的合同与PROs签约。根据第四份工作范围,HCFA于1990年启动了医疗保健质量改进计划(HCQIP),作为持续质量改进原则的一种应用。从那时起,PROs与医疗保健提供者参与合作项目,以提高主要为医疗保险受益人提供的住院护理质量。通过HCFA提供的行政数据以及从患者记录中提取的临床数据,PROs能够确定改善患者护理的机会。1995年5月,HCFA提出了一项新的第五份工作范围,这将把HCQIP的重点从住院护理项目转移到门诊和管理式护理环境中的项目。本文描述了HCQIP流程、PROs与医疗保健提供者开展合作项目所使用的数据类型,以及在提高医疗保险受益人所接受护理质量方面的信息学挑战。

相似文献

4
Health Care Quality Improvement Program: a new approach.
Health Care Financ Rev. 1995 Summer;16(4):15-23.
6
HCFA's Health Care Quality Improvement Program and the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1994 Dec;58(6):1858-62. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)91727-2.
7
IPRO's Health Care Quality Improvement Program.
J Community Health. 1995 Feb;20(1):59-64. doi: 10.1007/BF02260495.
9
Assessing HCFA's Health Care Quality Improvement Program.评估医疗保健财务管理局的医疗质量改进计划。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1997 Oct;23(10):550-60. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30339-x.
10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Peer review organizations: scientific challenges in HCFA's health care quality improvement initiative.
Med Care Rev. 1994 Spring;51(1):39-60. doi: 10.1177/107755879405100103.
3
Looking for answers in all the wrong places.
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Oct 15;119(8):855-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-8-199310150-00014.
5
The Uniform Clinical Data Set: an evaluation of the proposed national database for Medicare's quality review program.
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Dec 15;119(12):1209-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-12-199312150-00008.
6
Epidemiologic uses of Medicare data.医疗保险数据的流行病学用途。
Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15(2):319-27. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036123.
10
Making judgements about treatment effectiveness based on health outcomes: theoretical and practical issues.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1994 Oct;20(10):547-54. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30100-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验