Formenti S C, Shrivastava P N, Sapozink M, Jozsef G, Chan K K, Jeffers S, Morrow P C, Muggia F M
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles 90033, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 Jul 15;35(5):993-1001. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(96)00092-2.
To investigate the feasibility, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal (i.p.) carboplatin (CB) with concomitant abdomino-pelvic hyperthermia (HT) in advanced ovarian cancer patients.
Patients with residual disease mainly confined to the peritoneal cavity after platinum based chemotherapy received an initial course of i.p. CB for baseline pharmacokinetics followed by three cycles of i.p. CB with concomitant regional hyperthermia. The goal of HT was to achieve at least 45 min of intraperitoneal temperature > 42 degrees but < 50 degrees C while maintaining normal tissue temperatures < 43 degrees C and systemic body temperatures < 38 degrees C. No analgesic premedication was used. Thermometry was recorded by multisensor fiberoptic probes placed within the peritoneal cavity, bladder, vagina, and oral cavity.
Thirteen patients received a total of 31 sessions. Our intraperitoneal temperature goal could not be achieved because of patient intolerance. At best, we could maintain intraperitoneal temperatures > 40 degrees C, for more than 40 min in 7 of 31 sessions. The average values of thermal variables were T90 = 40 degrees C, TAVE = 41 degrees C, TMIN = 38.2 degrees C, and TMAX = 42.9 degrees C. The mean maximum systemic temperature was 38 degrees C. Acute thermal toxicities requiring early interruption of hyperthermia were systemic temperature exceeding 38 degrees C (11 of 31), abdominal pain or generalized distress (20 of 31), and vomiting (2 of 31). Hematological toxicities were not increased by hyperthermia. Pharmacokinetics were consistent with enhanced clearance of CB by HT. Lower radio frequencies (< 75 MHz) achieved better heat deposition in the peritoneal cavity than higher frequencies (> 75 MHz). Two of the 13 patients (a Stage III and a Stage IV patient) are alive with no evidence of disease at 40 and 43 months from treatment.
Intraperitoneal temperatures in the range of 40 degrees C maintained for approximately 40 min can be achieved within the described setting. The probability of successful induction of therapeutic intraperitoneal temperatures appears to be higher when frequencies below 75 MHz are used. Patients who are potentially platinum sensitive and have minimal residual disease could potentially benefit from the combined treatment under the conditions studied. However, this temperature-time range appears inadequate against platinum resistant disease, and/or bulky residual pelvic disease. Alternative approaches such as whole body hyperthermia and carboplatin are warranted to overcome some of the obstacles observed.
探讨晚期卵巢癌患者腹腔内注射卡铂(CB)并同时进行腹盆腔热疗(HT)的可行性、毒性及药代动力学。
铂类化疗后残留病灶主要局限于腹腔的患者,先接受一个疗程的腹腔内注射卡铂以测定基线药代动力学,随后进行三个疗程的腹腔内注射卡铂并同时进行区域热疗。热疗的目标是使腹腔温度至少在45分钟内维持在42℃至50℃之间,同时保持正常组织温度低于43℃,全身体温低于38℃。未使用镇痛预处理药物。通过放置在腹腔、膀胱、阴道和口腔内的多传感器光纤探头记录体温。
13例患者共接受了31次治疗。由于患者不耐受,未能达到我们设定的腹腔温度目标。在31次治疗中,最多只能在7次治疗中使腹腔温度在40℃以上维持超过40分钟。热变量的平均值为T90 = 40℃,TAVE = 41℃,TMIN = 38.2℃,TMAX = 42.9℃。平均最高全身温度为38℃。需要提前中断热疗的急性热毒性反应包括全身温度超过38℃(31次中有11次)、腹痛或全身不适(31次中有20次)以及呕吐(31次中有2次)。热疗未增加血液学毒性。药代动力学结果表明热疗可增强卡铂的清除率。较低的射频频率(<75MHz)在腹腔内的热沉积效果优于较高频率(>75MHz)。13例患者中有2例(1例Ⅲ期和1例Ⅳ期患者)在治疗后40个月和43个月时存活且无疾病证据。
在所描述的条件下,可以实现腹腔温度在40℃左右维持约40分钟。使用低于75MHz的频率时,成功诱导治疗性腹腔温度的概率似乎更高。在本研究条件下,对铂类药物可能敏感且残留病灶极少的患者可能从联合治疗中获益。然而,这个温度 -时间范围对于铂类耐药疾病和/或大量残留盆腔病灶似乎并不足够。有必要采用如全身热疗和卡铂等替代方法来克服所观察到的一些障碍。