• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

化学髓核溶解术后椎间盘切除术与再次椎间盘切除术的比较:一项为期1至13年的前瞻性研究

Postchemonucleolysis discectomy versus repeat discectomy: a prospective 1- to 13-year comparison.

作者信息

Javid M J

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin Medical School and Clinical Science Center, Madison, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 1996 Aug;85(2):231-8. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.85.2.0231.

DOI:10.3171/jns.1996.85.2.0231
PMID:8755751
Abstract

This long-term prospective study evaluates the clinical results of subsequent laminectomy in 103 consecutive patients who initially underwent chemonucleolysis (CNL) or laminectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Between 1981 and 1994, 53 patients who had received CNL initially and then underwent laminectomy and 50 patients treated initially with laminectomy underwent a repeat laminectomy. Clinical assessment at 6 weeks showed a success rate of 80.8% for post-CNL laminectomy and 78% for repeat laminectomy. At 6 months, the success rate for patients treated with CNL was 86% versus 78.7% for laminectomy. At 12 months, the overall success rate for the CNL group was 80.4% versus 83.3% for the laminectomy group, but in patients who had not obtained relief from the first procedure the success rate for the second procedure was higher for the post-CNL patients. A questionnaire was sent to all patients for 1- to 13-year follow-up review. The average follow-up period was 6.6 years for post-CNL laminectomy and 5.2 years for repeat laminectomy. The long-term success rate (81.8%) was higher in the post-CNL group compared to 64.4% in the repeat laminectomy group. Seven patients in the post-CNL group and nine in the repeat laminectomy group had undergone a third operation. When these originally successfully treated patients were reassigned after unsuccessful outcomes, the success rate for the CNL groups was 72.7%, versus 51.1% in the laminectomy group (p = 0.049). Employment rates were 80% for patients with CNL (21.8% changed jobs) and 76.3% for patients undergoing laminectomy (48.3% changed jobs) (p = 0.036). In conclusion, patients who underwent laminectomies after receiving CNL had significantly better long-term results than those who had repeat laminectomies.

摘要

这项长期前瞻性研究评估了103例因腰椎间盘突出症最初接受化学髓核溶解术(CNL)或椎板切除术的连续患者随后进行椎板切除术的临床结果。在1981年至1994年期间,53例最初接受CNL然后进行椎板切除术的患者和50例最初接受椎板切除术治疗的患者接受了再次椎板切除术。6周时的临床评估显示,CNL后椎板切除术的成功率为80.8%,再次椎板切除术的成功率为78%。6个月时,接受CNL治疗的患者成功率为86%,而椎板切除术患者为78.7%。12个月时,CNL组的总体成功率为80.4%,而椎板切除术组为83.3%,但在首次手术未缓解的患者中,第二次手术的成功率在CNL后患者中更高。向所有患者发送了一份问卷,进行1至13年的随访复查。CNL后椎板切除术的平均随访期为6.6年,再次椎板切除术为5.2年。CNL组的长期成功率(81.8%)高于再次椎板切除术组的64.4%。CNL组有7例患者和再次椎板切除术组有9例患者接受了第三次手术。当这些最初成功治疗的患者在治疗失败后重新分类时,CNL组的成功率为72.7%,而椎板切除术组为51.1%(p = 0.049)。CNL患者的就业率为80%(21.8%更换了工作),接受椎板切除术的患者为76.3%(48.3%更换了工作)(p = 0.036)。总之,接受CNL后进行椎板切除术的患者长期结果明显优于接受再次椎板切除术的患者。

相似文献

1
Postchemonucleolysis discectomy versus repeat discectomy: a prospective 1- to 13-year comparison.化学髓核溶解术后椎间盘切除术与再次椎间盘切除术的比较:一项为期1至13年的前瞻性研究
J Neurosurg. 1996 Aug;85(2):231-8. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.85.2.0231.
2
Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease: nationwide cohort study.腰椎间盘疾病手术后的再次手术率:全国队列研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Apr 1;38(7):581-90. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318274f9a7.
3
A 1- to 4-year follow-up review of treatment of sciatica using chemonucleolysis or laminectomy.对使用化学髓核溶解术或椎板切除术治疗坐骨神经痛进行的1至4年随访复查。
J Neurosurg. 1992 Feb;76(2):184-90. doi: 10.3171/jns.1992.76.2.0184.
4
Efficacy of chymopapain in chemonucleolysis. A review.木瓜凝乳蛋白酶在化学髓核溶解术中的疗效。一篇综述。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Nov 15;19(22):2578-83. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199411001-00014.
5
Prospective randomized trial of chemonucleolysis compared with surgery for soft disc herniation with 1-year, intermediate, and long-term outcome: part I: the clinical outcome.前瞻性随机临床试验比较化学核溶解术与手术治疗软性椎间盘突出症的 1 年、中期和长期结果:第 1 部分:临床结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Aug 1;38(17):E1051-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829729b3.
6
Transforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the combination of a low-dose chymopapain: a prospective randomized study in 280 consecutive cases.经椎间孔后外侧内镜下椎间盘切除术联合或不联合低剂量木瓜凝乳蛋白酶:280例连续病例的前瞻性随机研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 15;31(24):E890-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000245955.22358.3a.
7
[A contrastive study of treating single level recurrent lumbar disc herniation].单节段复发性腰椎间盘突出症治疗的对比研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2008 Apr;22(4):411-5.
8
Recurrent lumbar disc herniation after discectomy: outcome of repeat discectomy.椎间盘切除术后复发性腰椎间盘突出症:再次椎间盘切除术的结果
Surg Neurol. 2005 Sep;64(3):226-31; discussion 231. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.11.003.
9
Laminectomy with and without spinal fusion.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Nov(224):134-7.
10
A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy: short-term outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior anular defect.有限性与次全后路椎间盘切除术的前瞻性对照研究:腰椎间盘突出症合并大型后纵韧带缺损患者的短期疗效
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 15;31(6):653-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000203714.76250.68.

引用本文的文献

1
The technological development of minimally invasive spine surgery.微创脊柱手术的技术发展
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:293582. doi: 10.1155/2014/293582. Epub 2014 May 21.