Piérard D, De Meyer A, Rosseel P, Lauwers S
Départment de Microbiologie, Hôpital académique, VUB, Bruxelles, Belgique.
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1996 May;44(5):358-62.
Routine determination of antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic clinical isolates is difficult. The E-test is a practical alternative technique that we evaluated while testing clinical isolates in a multicenter study. The susceptibility to 9 antibiotics (penicillin, amoxycillin/clavulanate, ticarcillin/clavulanate, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, cefoxitin, metronidazole, clindamycin, chloramphenicol) of 351 strains belonging to 63 different species was determined by the NCCLS reference agar dilution procedure using Wilkins-Chalgren agar medium with 5% sheep blood and was compared to the E-test performed on the same medium and using manufacturer's recommendations. The MIC values obtained with the E-test were generally one dilution lower than those obtained with the reference technique, 87.1% of the results being within two dilutions. In terms of susceptibility categories, 95.1% agreement was observed with 3.8% minor errors and only 0.5% major and 0.6% very major errors. With some Fusobacterium spp. and Clostridium spp. strains, the E-test was difficult to read or not interpretable because of the presence of growth within the inhibition zone of all beta-lactam antibiotics, representing a trailing phenomenon. We conclude that, if some interpretation difficulties are taken into account, the E-test is a convenient and reliable technique that can be applied in all clinical laboratories. It could be used for the individual testing of important anaerobes in certain clinical situations but cannot yet be considered as a reference technique. Its utility is emphasised by the increased resistance rate against clindamycin and the appearance of a few strains in the B. fragilis group with a reduced susceptibility against metronidazole.
常规测定厌氧临床分离株的抗菌药敏性很困难。E-test是一种实用的替代技术,我们在一项多中心研究中对临床分离株进行检测时对其进行了评估。采用含5%羊血的Wilkins-Chalgren琼脂培养基,通过NCCLS参考琼脂稀释法测定了属于63个不同菌种的351株菌株对9种抗生素(青霉素、阿莫西林/克拉维酸、替卡西林/克拉维酸、哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、亚胺培南、头孢西丁、甲硝唑、克林霉素、氯霉素)的药敏性,并与在相同培养基上按照制造商推荐方法进行的E-test结果进行比较。E-test获得的MIC值通常比参考技术获得的值低一个稀释度,87.1%的结果在两个稀释度范围内。在药敏类别方面,观察到95.1%的一致性,有3.8%的小误差,只有0.5%的大误差和0.6%的非常大误差。对于一些梭杆菌属和梭菌属菌株,由于所有β-内酰胺类抗生素的抑菌圈内均有生长,这是一种拖尾现象,导致E-test难以读数或无法解释。我们得出结论,如果考虑到一些解释上的困难,E-test是一种方便可靠的技术,可应用于所有临床实验室。它可用于某些临床情况下重要厌氧菌的单独检测,但尚不能被视为参考技术。克林霉素耐药率的增加以及脆弱拟杆菌群中出现少数对甲硝唑敏感性降低的菌株,凸显了其效用。