Lemmens T
Centre de Recherche en Droit Public, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Br Med Bull. 1996 Apr;52(2):341-53. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011549.
This chapter describes some dominant trends of American and Canadian law in relation to treatment refusal, physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. Although common law in both countries recognizes the right of patients to refuse treatment, problems have arisen, especially in the US, over treatment refusal on behalf of incompetent patients. One response has been to enact advance-directive legislation, promoting the use of living wills and proxy appointments. Courts have also specified criteria for withholding and withdrawing treatment from incompetent patients. The notion of a "right to die', developed in court cases on treatment refusal, is now being invoked to support the legalization of assisted suicide. Courts are generally reluctant to recognize an extention of this right. Debates and court cases following the recent initiative to legalize assisted suicide in Oregon and the Sue Rodriguez case in Canada's Supreme Court, which resulted in a special report of a Canadian Senate Committee, are of major importance for the development of law in this area.
本章描述了美国和加拿大法律在治疗拒绝、医生协助自杀和安乐死方面的一些主要趋势。尽管两国的普通法都承认患者拒绝治疗的权利,但在代表无行为能力患者拒绝治疗方面出现了问题,尤其是在美国。一种应对措施是颁布预先指示立法,促进生前遗嘱和委托授权的使用。法院还规定了对无行为能力患者停止和撤销治疗的标准。在关于治疗拒绝的法庭案件中形成的“死亡权”概念,现在正被用来支持协助自杀合法化。法院通常不愿承认这一权利的延伸。俄勒冈州最近将协助自杀合法化的倡议以及加拿大最高法院的苏·罗德里格斯案引发的辩论和法庭案件,导致了加拿大参议院委员会的一份特别报告,这些对该领域法律的发展至关重要。