Springer A
J Anal Psychol. 1996 Jul;41(3):325-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-5922.1996.00325.x.
The author presents some ideas derived from observation in analysis about differing positions of Freud and Jung on perversion and about probable differences in perverse structural elements of women in contrast to men. In general perversion is understood as a defence of the self; in particular with women it is seen as a defensive way of achieving a false wholeness, a pseudo-androgyny. A case study describes the unfolding of a perverted transference. The importance of reaching the analyst and being understood by the analyst through projective identification is stressed. Quite often a sexually abusing mother seems to play an important role in generating female perversion; the implications in analysis are discussed as well as some ideas about culture and gender.
作者提出了一些在分析中通过观察得出的观点,这些观点涉及弗洛伊德和荣格在变态问题上的不同立场,以及女性与男性在变态结构元素方面可能存在的差异。一般来说,变态被理解为自我的一种防御;具体到女性,它被视为实现虚假完整、伪两性同体的一种防御方式。一个案例研究描述了一种变态移情的发展过程。强调了通过投射性认同与分析师建立联系并被分析师理解的重要性。经常会出现这样的情况,性虐待母亲似乎在引发女性变态方面扮演重要角色;文中讨论了其在分析中的影响以及一些关于文化和性别的观点。