Strunk H M, Schild H H
Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Germany.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996 May-Jun;7(3):361-6. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(96)72867-1.
To evaluate changes in the diameter of downstream iliac arteries after percutaneous interventions, which may be important for stent or balloon size determination.
Angiographic studies were reviewed respectively for 31 patients in whom a unilateral common iliac artery occlusion (n = 10) or a high-grade stenosis (> 75%; n = 21) was treated with stent implantation (26 patients) or balloon angioplasty (five patients).
Before intervention, the ipsilateral downstream arteries showed a luminal reduction in 26 of 31 patients (mean 24% +/- 11.0; range, 6%-64%) compared with the opposite artery. This side-to-side difference was statistically significant for the external iliac artery (P = .000007) and for the common iliac artery distal to the obstruction (P = .017). In 17 of 26 patients, the side-to-side difference of the downstream external iliac artery was fully reversible immediately after intervention. In five patients, a luminal widening was noted. No change was seen in only four patients.
Because downstream arteries often show a marked luminal widening after intervention, determination of balloon or stent size cannot be based solely on the diameter of downstream ("normal") ipsilateral artery before intervention.
评估经皮介入治疗后髂动脉下游直径的变化,这对于确定支架或球囊尺寸可能很重要。
对31例患者的血管造影研究进行了回顾,其中10例患者为单侧髂总动脉闭塞,21例患者为重度狭窄(>75%),分别接受了支架植入术(26例患者)或球囊血管成形术(5例患者)。
干预前,与对侧动脉相比,31例患者中有26例同侧下游动脉管腔缩小(平均24%±11.0;范围6%-64%)。这种左右差异在股动脉(P = 0.000007)和梗阻远端的髂总动脉(P = 0.017)中具有统计学意义。26例患者中有17例,干预后股动脉下游的左右差异立即完全可逆。5例患者出现管腔增宽。仅4例患者未见变化。
由于干预后下游动脉常出现明显的管腔增宽,因此不能仅根据干预前下游(“正常”)同侧动脉的直径来确定球囊或支架的尺寸。