Suppr超能文献

与β受体阻滞剂-小剂量氯噻酮治疗相比,维拉帕米-群多普利联合治疗在2型糖尿病高血压患者中的代谢中性。

Metabolic neutrality of combined verapamil-trandolapril treatment in contrast to beta-blocker-low-dose chlortalidone treatment in hypertensive type 2 diabetes.

作者信息

Schneider M, Lerch M, Papiri M, Buechel P, Boehlen L, Shaw S, Risen W, Weidmann P

机构信息

Medizinische Poliklinik, Universität Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 1996 May;14(5):669-77. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199605000-00018.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the metabolic, antihypertensive and albuminuria-modifying effects of a heart rate-modulating calcium antagonist-angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor combination compared with those of a beta-blocker-low-dose diuretic combination in non-insulin-dependent diabetic hypertensives.

DESIGN

A prospective randomized double-blind study.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty-four diabetics with diastolic blood pressure 90-115 mmHg without azotemia (plasma creatinine level < 150 mumol/l) were evaluated after 4 weeks receiving placebo and 12 weeks receiving treatment either with combined slow-release verapamil (retard formulation) and trandolapril (mean maintenance doses, 180 and 1.6 mg daily) or with atenolol and chlortalidone (71 and 18 mg daily). Insulin sensitivity (by the minimal model method of Bergman), additional metabolic variables, clinic blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure profile and renal indices were assessed at the end of the placebo and active treatment phases.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, the two therapies produced similar decreases in mean supine clinic blood pressure [10 +/- 3 versus 11 +/- 3% (means +/- SEM)], upright clinic blood pressure (10 +/- 4 versus 11 +/- 4%) and ambulatory daytime blood pressure (9 +/- 2 versus 12 +/- 3%). However, although the verapamil-trandolapril combination was found to be metabolically neutral, the atenolol-chlortalidone combination aggravated insulin resistance [insulin sensitivity index, from (0.8 +/- 0.2) to (0.3 +/- 0.1) x 10(-4)/min per U per ml], increased the serum triglycerides level and decreased the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and plasma potassium levels. Although both therapies tended to reduce 24 h albuminuria, this was significant for the verapamil-trandolapril treatment only.

CONCLUSIONS

Because the effect of any antihypertensive drug, including diuretics and beta-blockers, on cardiovascular morbidity and on mortality in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients is not known, rational treatment selection can presently be based only on surrogate end-points. Therefore, the triad of metabolic neutrality with antihypertensive and antiproteinuric efficacy supports combined verapamil-trandolapril as a potentially valuable therapy for hypertension accompanying diabetes mellitus.

摘要

目的

在非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病高血压患者中,研究心率调节型钙拮抗剂 - 血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂联合用药与β受体阻滞剂 - 低剂量利尿剂联合用药相比的代谢、降压及蛋白尿改善作用。

设计

一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。

研究对象与方法

24名舒张压为90 - 115 mmHg且无氮质血症(血浆肌酐水平 < 150 μmol/l)的糖尿病患者,在接受4周安慰剂治疗及12周治疗后进行评估,治疗方案为联合缓释维拉帕米(缓释制剂)和群多普利(平均维持剂量分别为每日180和1.6 mg)或阿替洛尔和氯噻酮(每日71和18 mg)。在安慰剂期和积极治疗期结束时,评估胰岛素敏感性(采用伯格曼最小模型法)、其他代谢变量、诊室血压、动态血压曲线及肾脏指标。

结果

与安慰剂相比,两种治疗方法使平均仰卧位诊室血压[10 ± 3% 对 11 ± 3%(均值 ± 标准误)]、直立位诊室血压(10 ± 4% 对 11 ± 4%)和动态日间血压(9 ± 2% 对 12 ± 3%)均有相似程度的下降。然而,虽然维拉帕米 - 群多普利联合用药在代谢方面呈中性,但阿替洛尔 - 氯噻酮联合用药加重了胰岛素抵抗[胰岛素敏感性指数,从(0.8 ± 0.2)降至(0.3 ± 0.1)×10⁻⁴/min per U per ml],增加了血清甘油三酯水平,降低了高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和血浆钾水平。虽然两种治疗方法均倾向于降低24小时蛋白尿,但仅维拉帕米 - 群多普利治疗有显著效果。

结论

由于包括利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂在内的任何降压药物对非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者心血管发病率和死亡率的影响尚不清楚,目前合理的治疗选择只能基于替代终点。因此,代谢中性且具有降压和抗蛋白尿疗效这一特点支持联合使用维拉帕米 - 群多普利作为糖尿病伴高血压潜在的有价值治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验