Schneider M, Lerch M, Papiri M, Buechel P, Boehlen L, Shaw S, Risen W, Weidmann P
Medizinische Poliklinik, Universität Bern, Switzerland.
J Hypertens. 1996 May;14(5):669-77. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199605000-00018.
To investigate the metabolic, antihypertensive and albuminuria-modifying effects of a heart rate-modulating calcium antagonist-angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor combination compared with those of a beta-blocker-low-dose diuretic combination in non-insulin-dependent diabetic hypertensives.
A prospective randomized double-blind study.
Twenty-four diabetics with diastolic blood pressure 90-115 mmHg without azotemia (plasma creatinine level < 150 mumol/l) were evaluated after 4 weeks receiving placebo and 12 weeks receiving treatment either with combined slow-release verapamil (retard formulation) and trandolapril (mean maintenance doses, 180 and 1.6 mg daily) or with atenolol and chlortalidone (71 and 18 mg daily). Insulin sensitivity (by the minimal model method of Bergman), additional metabolic variables, clinic blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure profile and renal indices were assessed at the end of the placebo and active treatment phases.
Compared with placebo, the two therapies produced similar decreases in mean supine clinic blood pressure [10 +/- 3 versus 11 +/- 3% (means +/- SEM)], upright clinic blood pressure (10 +/- 4 versus 11 +/- 4%) and ambulatory daytime blood pressure (9 +/- 2 versus 12 +/- 3%). However, although the verapamil-trandolapril combination was found to be metabolically neutral, the atenolol-chlortalidone combination aggravated insulin resistance [insulin sensitivity index, from (0.8 +/- 0.2) to (0.3 +/- 0.1) x 10(-4)/min per U per ml], increased the serum triglycerides level and decreased the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and plasma potassium levels. Although both therapies tended to reduce 24 h albuminuria, this was significant for the verapamil-trandolapril treatment only.
Because the effect of any antihypertensive drug, including diuretics and beta-blockers, on cardiovascular morbidity and on mortality in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients is not known, rational treatment selection can presently be based only on surrogate end-points. Therefore, the triad of metabolic neutrality with antihypertensive and antiproteinuric efficacy supports combined verapamil-trandolapril as a potentially valuable therapy for hypertension accompanying diabetes mellitus.
在非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病高血压患者中,研究心率调节型钙拮抗剂 - 血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂联合用药与β受体阻滞剂 - 低剂量利尿剂联合用药相比的代谢、降压及蛋白尿改善作用。
一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。
24名舒张压为90 - 115 mmHg且无氮质血症(血浆肌酐水平 < 150 μmol/l)的糖尿病患者,在接受4周安慰剂治疗及12周治疗后进行评估,治疗方案为联合缓释维拉帕米(缓释制剂)和群多普利(平均维持剂量分别为每日180和1.6 mg)或阿替洛尔和氯噻酮(每日71和18 mg)。在安慰剂期和积极治疗期结束时,评估胰岛素敏感性(采用伯格曼最小模型法)、其他代谢变量、诊室血压、动态血压曲线及肾脏指标。
与安慰剂相比,两种治疗方法使平均仰卧位诊室血压[10 ± 3% 对 11 ± 3%(均值 ± 标准误)]、直立位诊室血压(10 ± 4% 对 11 ± 4%)和动态日间血压(9 ± 2% 对 12 ± 3%)均有相似程度的下降。然而,虽然维拉帕米 - 群多普利联合用药在代谢方面呈中性,但阿替洛尔 - 氯噻酮联合用药加重了胰岛素抵抗[胰岛素敏感性指数,从(0.8 ± 0.2)降至(0.3 ± 0.1)×10⁻⁴/min per U per ml],增加了血清甘油三酯水平,降低了高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和血浆钾水平。虽然两种治疗方法均倾向于降低24小时蛋白尿,但仅维拉帕米 - 群多普利治疗有显著效果。
由于包括利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂在内的任何降压药物对非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者心血管发病率和死亡率的影响尚不清楚,目前合理的治疗选择只能基于替代终点。因此,代谢中性且具有降压和抗蛋白尿疗效这一特点支持联合使用维拉帕米 - 群多普利作为糖尿病伴高血压潜在的有价值治疗方法。