Pisaturo C, Frasconi S, Borreani A
Divsione e Cattedra di Neuropsichiatria Infantile, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova.
Minerva Pediatr. 1996 Apr;48(4):135-41.
Aim of this study is to investigate whether the adverse neuropsychiatric effects of anticonvulsant drugs can affect the results of physical therapy. The influence of these drugs on neurological and/or psychological functions is considered an important factor in conditioning the active psycho-perceptuo-motor learning of child during physical therapy. Our case series included 30 children aged 4; 20 to 23 months. Ten (6 males; 4 females) received both physical therapy and anticonvulsants (generally single-drug therapy) (first group). Ten (3 males; 7 females) received only physical therapy (second group). The third group (5 males; 5 females) received only anticonvulsant drugs. All children were followed up for 4 years. Not significant differences in any of the scores obtained with standard and neuropsychological tests were found between the 3 groups. No significant change of muscle trophism was found between the 3 groups. The changes of tonus, found in the first two groups, were not significantly different, for these groups. Our findings seem to disagree from those reported by the most recent studies and suggest that anticonvulsant therapy doesn't interfere with the efficacy of physical therapy. However, our data cannot be generalized due to limited number of patients included in our series and further studies are needed.
本研究的目的是调查抗惊厥药物的不良神经精神作用是否会影响物理治疗的效果。这些药物对神经和/或心理功能的影响被认为是影响儿童在物理治疗期间积极的心理感知运动学习的一个重要因素。我们的病例系列包括30名4岁;20至23个月大的儿童。其中10名(6名男性;4名女性)接受了物理治疗和抗惊厥药物(通常为单药治疗)(第一组)。10名(3名男性;7名女性)仅接受物理治疗(第二组)。第三组(5名男性;5名女性)仅接受抗惊厥药物。所有儿童均随访4年。三组之间在标准测试和神经心理学测试中获得的任何分数均未发现显著差异。三组之间未发现肌肉营养状况有显著变化。在前两组中发现的肌张力变化,对于这两组来说,没有显著差异。我们的研究结果似乎与最近的研究所报告的结果不一致,并表明抗惊厥治疗不会干扰物理治疗的效果。然而,由于我们系列中纳入的患者数量有限,我们的数据不能一概而论,需要进一步的研究。